Woody vegetation patches in South Indian rice landscapes support tree-affiliated birds but reduce food production, with complex non-linear effects
Published version
Peer-reviewed
Repository URI
Repository DOI
Type
Change log
Abstract
ContextManaging agricultural landscapes for sustainability while maintaining high yields is a pressing challenge. Protecting and restoring native or semi-natural vegetation patches is often a core strategy, but its impacts are seldom measured at scales appropriate to understanding yield-biodiversity relationships.ObjectivesIn a predominantly rice-growing area of South India, we examined how increasing woody vegetation patch cover impacts (1) harvest- and landscape-level (25 ha) crop yield, (2) densities of birds of different trophic guilds and forest dependencies, and (3) bird community similarity to natural forests.MethodsWe sampled landscapes spanning a continuum of embedded vegetation patch cover. We used statistical weighting to account for confounders and fitted generalised linear and hierarchical Bayesian models, using g-computation to assess the effects of these patches on yield and bird biodiversity.ResultsVegetation patches reduced harvest-level yield at low cover levels, with landscape-level yield declining more sharply than expected based on patch-occupied area alone. Above ~ 10% cover, harvest-level yield slightly increased, while landscape-level yield remained constant. Pest control-contributing guild densities rose with vegetation cover, above a ~ 10% area threshold. Forest-dependent species responded positively to increasing vegetation cover, while non-forest species showed mixed responses. Similarity to forest bird communities increased with vegetation cover but remained low.ConclusionsVegetation patch-free landscapes maximise yield but are of low bird conservation value, and patch covers < 10% entail a yield penalty rather than providing ecosystem-service-related yield benefits, as theory predicts. Increasing vegetation cover from 10 to 20% improves biodiversity with no further yield penalties, suggesting that at least ~ 10% cover may be needed for multifunctional management in this South Indian context.
Description
Acknowledgements: I.B. was supported by the Whitten Studentship, School of Biological Sciences Fieldwork Fund, Tim Whitmore Zoology Fund, Hitchcock Fund, and Corpus Christi College Research Fund at the University of Cambridge. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript. We are immensely grateful to all the farmers who participated in this study, to Raja Bandi and Farida Tampal from WWF-India and to Rythu Sadhikara Samstha staff for their support in the field, and to Professor Parthiba Basu who has contributed to the development of the study but has sadly passed away.
Funder: Whitten studentship
Journal Title
Conference Name
Journal ISSN
1572-9761

