Repository logo
 

MINocyclinE to Reduce inflammation and blood-brain barrier leakage in small Vessel diseAse (MINERVA): A phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled experimental medicine trial

Published version
Peer-reviewed

Repository DOI


Change log

Authors

Brown, Robin B 
Tozer, Daniel J 
Loubière, Laurence 
Harshfield, Eric L 
Hong, Young T 

Abstract

Background: Cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) is a common cause of stroke and a major contributor to vascular dementia, but there are few treatments to delay disease progression. Neuroinflammation and increased blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability have been suggested to play a role in pathogenesis, and both can be visualised in man using advanced imaging. However, whether they drive disease progression and can be targeted therapeutically is uncertain. In a rodent model of SVD, minocycline treatment reduced white matter damage and markers of inflammation and BBB permeability, and improved behavioural outcomes. We determined whether minocycline had a similar effect in patients with moderate to severe SVD. Methods: MINERVA (ISRCTN15483452) was a phase II randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in a single UK centre. The study included 44 participants with moderate to severe SVD defined as a clinical lacunar stroke and confluent MRI white matter hyperintensities, who were randomly assigned 1:1 to either minocycline 100mg twice daily or placebo for three months. The co-primary outcome measures were volume of focal areas of increased microglial signal (determined using 11C-PK11195 positron emission tomography) and increased blood-brain barrier permeability (measured using dynamic contrast-enhanced [DCE] MRI). Secondary outcome measures included change in inflammatory biomarkers in serum. Results: 44 participants were recruited between September 2019 and June 2022. All 44 were included in a modified intention-to-treat analysis: 23 in the minocycline group and 21 in the placebo group. Mean age was 73.0 ± 8.9 years in the treatment group and 66.5 ± 11.9 in the placebo group (p = 0.04), but other baseline demographics were balanced. Participants were recruited at a mean of 23.1 ± 24.7 months post stroke. Hotspots of increased 11C-PK11195 binding and increased BBB permeability were present in the participants. There was no treatment effect of minocycline on the change in percentage of 11C-PK11195 binding hotspots (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.98 – 1.04), or on BBB permeability hotspots (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.91 – 1.03). All secondary analyses, as well as the per-protocol analysis, showed no treatment effect. There was also no significant treatment effect on C-reactive protein levels or on any of the individual biomarkers in a proteomics panel targeting vascular inflammation and endothelial activation.
Interpretation: Although increased 11C-PK11195 binding consistent with microglial activation, and increased BBB permeability on DCE-MRI, are both present in SVD, treatment with minocycline did not reduce measurements of either process. Our findings do not support a phase 3 trial of minocycline therapy to delay SVD progression. Whether these pathophysiological mechanisms are causal, or secondary to tissue damage, remains to be determined.

Description

Publication status: Published


Funder: Association of British Neurologists / Guarantors of Brain

Keywords

blood‐brain barrier, cerebral small vessel disease, neuroinflammation, vascular cognitive impairment, vascular dementia, Humans, Minocycline, Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases, Male, Blood-Brain Barrier, Double-Blind Method, Female, Aged, Positron-Emission Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Inflammation, Middle Aged

Journal Title

Alzheimer's and Dementia

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

1552-5260
1552-5279

Volume Title

Publisher

Wiley
Sponsorship
British Heart Foundation (RE/18/1/34212)
National Institute for Health and Care Research (IS-BRC-1215-20014)
Medical Research Council (MR/N026896/1)
This work was funded by a Medical Research Council experimental medicine grant. Infrastructural support was provided by the Cambridge British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence (RE/18/1/34212) and Cambridge University Hospitals NIHR Biomedical Research Centre (BRC-1215-20014). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, NHS, or UK Department of Health and Social Care.