Repository logo
 

Non-occupational physical activity and risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer and mortality outcomes: a dose-response meta-analysis of large prospective studies.

Accepted version
Peer-reviewed

Type

Article

Change log

Authors

Abbas, Ali 
Mok, Alexander 

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the dose-response associations between non-occupational physical activity and several chronic disease and mortality outcomes in the general adult population. DESIGN: Systematic review and cohort-level dose-response meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and reference lists of published studies. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Prospective cohort studies with (1) general population samples >10 000 adults, (2) ≥3 physical activity categories, and (3) risk measures and CIs for all-cause mortality or incident total cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, stroke, heart failure, total cancer and site-specific cancers (head and neck, myeloid leukaemia, myeloma, gastric cardia, lung, liver, endometrium, colon, breast, bladder, rectum, oesophagus, prostate, kidney). RESULTS: 196 articles were included, covering 94 cohorts with >30 million participants. The evidence base was largest for all-cause mortality (50 separate results; 163 415 543 person-years, 811 616 events), and incidence of cardiovascular disease (37 results; 28 884 209 person-years, 74 757 events) and cancer (31 results; 35 500 867 person-years, 185 870 events). In general, higher activity levels were associated with lower risk of all outcomes. Differences in risk were greater between 0 and 8.75 marginal metabolic equivalent of task-hours per week (mMET-hours/week) (equivalent to the recommended 150 min/week of moderate-to-vigorous aerobic physical activity), with smaller marginal differences in risk above this level to 17.5 mMET-hours/week, beyond which additional differences were small and uncertain. Associations were stronger for all-cause (relative risk (RR) at 8.75 mMET-hours/week: 0.69, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.73) and cardiovascular disease (RR at 8.75 mMET-hours/week: 0.71, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.77) mortality than for cancer mortality (RR at 8.75 mMET-hours/week: 0.85, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.89). If all insufficiently active individuals had achieved 8.75 mMET-hours/week, 15.7% (95% CI 13.1 to 18.2) of all premature deaths would have been averted. CONCLUSIONS: Inverse non-linear dose-response associations suggest substantial protection against a range of chronic disease outcomes from small increases in non-occupational physical activity in inactive adults. PROSPERO registration number CRD42018095481.

Description

Keywords

epidemiology, health, meta-analysis, noncommunicable diseases, physical activity, Male, Adult, Female, Humans, Prospective Studies, Cardiovascular Diseases, Exercise, Neoplasms, Chronic Disease

Journal Title

Br J Sports Med

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

0306-3674
1473-0480

Volume Title

Publisher

BMJ
Sponsorship
Medical Research Council (MR/P02663X/1)
Medical Research Council (MR/K023187/1)
European Commission Horizon 2020 (H2020) ERC (817754)
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (CUH) (146281)
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) (via Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute) (APP 1142685)
Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12015/3)
MRC (MC_UU_00006/4)
Wellcome Trust (087636/Z/08/Z)
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G007462/1)
Medical Research Council (MR/K025147/1)
Medical Research Council (MR/P024408/1)
National Institute for Health and Care Research (IS-BRC-1215-20014)
MRC (MC_UU_00006/5)
Garcia, Abbas, and Woodcock were supported by METAHIT, an MRC Methodology Panel project (MR/P02663X/1). Abbas, Pearce, and Woodcock have received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (grant agreement 817754) (this material reflects only the author’s views, and the Commission is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein). Garcia, Abbas, and Woodcock were supported by the Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), a UKCRC Public Health Research Centre of Excellence funded by the British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Economic and Social Research Council, Medical Research Council, the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and the Wellcome Trust (MR/K023187/1). Dempsey was supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Research Fellowship (No. 1142685). Golubic was supported by a Gates Cambridge Scholarship. Pearce and Brage was supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Cambridge (IS-BRC-1215-20014). Mok was supported by the National Science Scholarship from Singapore, A*STAR. Sa was supported by the São Paulo Research Foundation (2012/08565-4 and 2013/25624-7), and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (200358/2014-6 and 402648/2015-3). Pearce, Strain, Dempsey, Wijndaele, and Brage were supported by UK Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12015/3, MC_UU_00006/4). Funders and sponsors had no role in any stage of the work.
Relationships
Is previous version of:
Is derived from: