How should we evaluate sweetened beverage tax policies? A review of worldwide experience
Published version
Peer-reviewed
Repository URI
Repository DOI
Type
Change log
Authors
Abstract
Abstract: Over 45 jurisdictions globally have implemented sweetened beverage taxes. Researchers and policymakers need to assess whether and how these taxes change beverage demand and supply, their intended and unanticipated health, economic and equity impacts. Lessons from such evaluations can maximise the policies’ success and impact on non-communicable disease prevention globally. We discuss key theoretical, design and methodological considerations to help policymakers, funders and researchers commission and conduct rigorous evaluations of these policies and related disease prevention efforts. We encourage involving the perspectives of various stakeholders on what evaluations are needed given the specific context, what data and methods are appropriate, readily available or can be collected within time and budget constraints. A logic model /conceptual system map of anticipated implications across sectors and scales should help identify optimal study design, analytical techniques and measures. These models should be updated when synthesising findings across diverse methods and integrating findings across subpopulations using similar methods.
Description
Funder: Laura and John Arnold Foundation; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100009827
Funder: Bloomberg Philanthropies
Funder: Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica (MX)
Funder: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003141
Funder: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000865
Keywords
Journal Title
Conference Name
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Sponsorship
National Institute for Health Research (16/130/01)
Medical Research Council (UK) (MC/UU/12015/6)
National Institute for Health Research (UK) (ES/G007462/1 and MR/K023187/1)
Wellcome Trust (087636/Z/08/Z)