Repository logo
 

Another tool in the experimental toolbox: On the use of aluminum as a substitute for chert in North American prehistoric ballistics research and beyond

cam.depositDate2022-01-25
cam.issuedOnline2022-01-25
cam.orpheus.success2022-01-26 - Embargo set during processing via Fast-track
dc.contributor.authorEren, MI
dc.contributor.authorMukusha, L
dc.contributor.authorLierenz, J
dc.contributor.authorWilson, M
dc.contributor.authorBebber, MR
dc.contributor.authorFisch, M
dc.contributor.authorTrue, T
dc.contributor.authorKavaulic, M
dc.contributor.authorWalker, RS
dc.contributor.authorBuchanan, B
dc.contributor.authorKey, A
dc.contributor.orcidEren, MI [0000-0003-3576-6076]
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-27T00:30:18Z
dc.date.available2022-01-27T00:30:18Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.updated2022-01-25T18:47:22Z
dc.description.abstract<jats:p> Experimental archaeology continues to mature methodologically and theoretically. Around the world, practitioners are increasingly using modern materials that would have been unavailable to prehistoric people in archaeological experiments. The use of a modern material substitute can offer several benefits to experimental method, design, control, replicability, feasibility, and cost, but it should be directly compared to its “traditional” analogue to understand similarities and differences. Here, aluminum is introduced as a substitute for chert in prehistoric ballistics research because, critically, aluminum is safe, inexpensive, easy to process, and it and chert possess densities that differ by less than 4%. The aluminum casting process for replicating stone artifacts is presented, and it is shown that the aluminum castings are essentially identical in form, flake-scar patterning, and mass to their stone counterparts. We then present a proof-of-concept ballistics experiment that demonstrates no difference between aluminum and stone points in terms of target penetration. </jats:p>
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.80374
dc.identifier.eissn1541-3543
dc.identifier.issn0197-6931
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/332949
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSAGE Publications
dc.publisher.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01976931221074386
dc.rightsAll Rights Reserved
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
dc.subjectExperimental Archaeology
dc.subjectProjectile Technology
dc.subjectLithic Technology
dc.titleAnother tool in the experimental toolbox: On the use of aluminum as a substitute for chert in North American prehistoric ballistics research and beyond
dc.typeArticle
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-12-28
prism.endingPage019769312210743
prism.publicationNameNorth American Archaeologist
prism.startingPage019769312210743
pubs.licence-display-nameApollo Repository Deposit Licence Agreement
pubs.licence-identifierapollo-deposit-licence-2-1
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1177/01976931221074386

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Eren et al Text REVISED.pdf
Size:
386.65 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted version
Licence
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved