Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJackson, D
dc.contributor.authorLaw, M
dc.contributor.authorRucker, G
dc.contributor.authorSchwarzer, G
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-04T14:43:19Z
dc.date.available2017-09-04T14:43:19Z
dc.date.issued2017-07-26
dc.identifier.issn0277-6715
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/267016
dc.description.abstractThe modified method for random-effects meta-analysis, usually attributed to Hartung andKnapp and also proposed by Sidik and Jonkman, is easy to implement and is becoming advocated for general use. Here, we examine a range of potential concerns about the widespread adoption of this method. Motivated by these issues, a variety of different conventions can be adopted when using the modified method in practice. We describe and investigate the use of a variety of these conventions using a new taxonomy ofmeta-analysis datasets.We conclude that the Hartung and Knapp modificationmay be a suitable replacement for the standard method. Despite this, analysts who advocate the modified method should be ready to defend its use against the possible objections to it that we present. We further recommend that the results from more conventional approaches should be used as sensitivity analyses when using the modified method. It has previously been suggested that a common-effect analysis should be used for this purpose but we suggest amending this recommendation and argue that a standard random-effects analysis should be used instead.
dc.description.sponsorshipUK Medical Research Council, Grant/Award Number: U105260558 ; NIHR, Grant/Award Number: RP-PG-0109-10056 ; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Grant/Award Number: RU1747/1-2
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectrandom-effects models
dc.subjectsmall sample inference
dc.subjectstatistical conventions
dc.titleThe Hartung-Knapp modification for random-effects meta-analysis: A useful refinement but are there any residual concerns?
dc.typeArticle
prism.endingPage12
prism.publicationDate2017
prism.publicationNameStatistics in Medicine
prism.startingPage1
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.12103
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-06-20
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1002/sim.7411
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-07-26
dc.contributor.orcidLaw, Martin [0000-0001-9594-348X]
dc.identifier.eissn1097-0258
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
pubs.funder-project-idMRC (unknown)
pubs.funder-project-idNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (via Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust) (unknown)
cam.issuedOnline2017-07-26


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution 4.0 International