Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlcover, M.
dc.contributor.authorCrowley, M. A.
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-02T12:20:26Z
dc.date.available2019-12-02T12:20:26Z
dc.date.issued2019-09-30
dc.identifier.otherCWPE1985
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/299470
dc.description.abstractThis article explores economic and legal issues in the WTO dispute China – Broiler Products (Article 21.5 – United States) (DS427). In 2011, the US initiated a dispute against the conduct and results of China’s 2009 trade remedy investigation into US broiler products (chickens). The Panel Report found that China had acted inconsistently with its WTO obligations. On the basis of a redetermination, China continued to impose duties and the United States initiated WTO compliance proceedings. The compliance Panel Report, circulated in 2018, concluded that China had failed to comply with its WTO obligations when allocating costs to construct US domestic prices for broiler products. However, China was found to have acted consistently with its WTO obligations with respect to two claims which raise some interesting legal questions. Ultimately, after almost a decade of litigation, China removed the antidumping and countervailing duties on US broiler products in 2018.
dc.publisherFaculty of Economics, University of Cambridge
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCambridge Working Papers in Economics
dc.rightsAll Rights Reserved
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/
dc.titleChina -- Broiler Products: Can the sum of the parts be less than the whole?
dc.typeWorking Paper
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.46541


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record