Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPickstock, Catherine
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-06T00:30:23Z
dc.date.available2020-03-06T00:30:23Z
dc.identifier.issn0870-5283
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/303073
dc.description.abstractIt has been argued that Jean-Luc Marion’s phenomenological mode, according to which phenomenology is the exhaustive content of a rigorous philosophy, is vulnerable to the criticism that no reality is given prior to signification and interpretation. This is the hypothesis that phenomenology is a moment within a more fundamental hermeneutic process, rather than vice versa. However, this hypothesis, together with the argument that phenomenology falls prey to ‘the myth of the given’, have been subjected to a critique by Marion himself, in his essay, ‘La Donation en son Herméneutique’ (2016), which throws light on his whole project. In this essay, I argue that Marion’s position is problematic, though many of his points are persuasive. I will claim that, for this reason, he hovers on the brink of a position that would undo his own attempted critique of metaphysics.
dc.description.sponsorshipNo external sponsorship
dc.rightsAll rights reserved
dc.titleThe phenomenological given and the hermeneutic exchange: which holds priority?
dc.typeArticle
prism.publicationNameRevista Portuguesa de Filosofia
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.50150
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-03-03
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-03-03
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
cam.orpheus.counter90
rioxxterms.freetoread.startdate2023-03-05


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record