Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRunde, Jochenen
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Pen
dc.contributor.authorGraça Moura, Men
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-21T23:30:25Z
dc.date.available2020-07-21T23:30:25Z
dc.date.issued2020-09en
dc.identifier.issn0309-166X
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/308223
dc.description.abstract1. Why history of economic thought? Why indeed? The vast majority of economists seem to regard the history of economic ideas as irrelevant at best or a nuisance at worst. The subject has long vanished from economics programmes in most English-speaking countries, even in the form of elective courses, and the same is true in many other places as well. It seems no exaggeration to say that most economics departments would quietly endorse Arthur Pigou’s view of the history of economics, as cited by Mark Blaug amongst others, as antiquarian researches on the wrong opinions of dead men (e.g., Blaug, 1997, p. 1; 2001, p. 154).
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.rightsAll rights reserved
dc.rights.uri
dc.titleOntology and the history of economic thought: an introductionen
dc.typeArticle
prism.endingPage990
prism.issueIdentifier5en
prism.publicationDate2020en
prism.publicationNameCambridge Journal of Economicsen
prism.startingPage981
prism.volume44en
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.55313
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-07-22en
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1093/cje/beaa039en
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-09en
dc.contributor.orcidRunde, Jochen [0000-0001-9596-5144]
dc.identifier.eissn1464-3545
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen
cam.issuedOnline2020-08-27en
cam.orpheus.successTue Oct 06 10:24:21 BST 2020 - Embargo updated*
cam.orpheus.counter10*
rioxxterms.freetoread.startdate2022-08-01


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record