Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHarvey, Darren
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-31T16:17:33Z
dc.date.available2016-10-31T16:17:33Z
dc.date.issued2017-02-09
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/260975
dc.descriptionThis is the final version of the article. It first appeared from Wolters Kluwer via http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=EURO2017006en
dc.description.abstractThis article provides an analysis of contemporary case law and subsequent academic commentary which suggests that a more process-oriented approach to proportionality review has recently been taken by the Court of Justice of the European Union. It argues that the manner in which process-oriented review has been utilized gives rise to a fundamental reconceptualization of the nature of the proportionality test at the EU level; moving away from a substantive, merits based concept of review towards something more akin to a procedural obligation to state the reasons which underpin a contested measure. The article highlights some of the problems that have arisen from this shift in approach from both a doctrinal and a theoretical perspective, whilst demonstrating the inconsistent way in which the Court has formulated and applied process-oriented proportionality review to date.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWolters Kluweren
dc.titleTowards Process-Oriented Proportionality Review In The European Unionen
dc.typeArticleen
prism.endingPage121
prism.issueIdentifier1
prism.publicationNameEuropean Public Lawen
prism.startingPage93
prism.volume23
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.6147
pubs.declined2017-10-11T13:54:41.773+0100
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-09-06
rioxxterms.versionVoRen
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=EURO2017006
cam.orpheus.successThu Jan 30 12:57:11 GMT 2020 - The item has an open VoR version.*
rioxxterms.freetoread.startdate2100-01-01


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record