Ordered Nanomaterials for Electron Field Emission
View / Open Files
Authors
Collins, Clare Melissa
Advisors
Robertson, John
Milne, William. I.
Cole, Matthew. T.
Date
2017-12-06Awarding Institution
University of Cambridge
Author Affiliation
Engineering
Qualification
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Language
English
Type
Thesis
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Collins, C. M. (2017). Ordered Nanomaterials for Electron Field Emission (Doctoral thesis). https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.17225
Abstract
In the quest for reliable, repeatable and stable field electron emission that has commercial potential, whilst many attempts have been made, none yet has been truly distinguishable as being successful. Whilst I do not claim within this thesis to have uncovered the secret to success, fundamental issues have been addressed that concern the future directions towards achieving its full potential.
An exhaustive comparison is made across the diverse range of materials that have, over the past 40-50 years, been postulated and indeed tested as field emitters. This has not previously been attempted. The materials are assessed according to the important metrics of turn on voltage, Eon, and maximum current density, Jmax, where low Eon and high Jmax are seen as desirable. The nano-carbons, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), in particular, perform well in both these metrics. No dependency was seen between the material work function and its performance as an emitter, which might have been suggested by the Fowler Nordheim equations.
To address the issues underlying the definition of the local enhancement factor, β, a number of variations of surface geometry using CNTs were fabricated. The field emission of these emitters was measured using two different approaches. The first is a Scanning Electrode Field Emission Microscope, SAFEM, which maps the emission at individual locations across the surface of the emitter, and the parallel plate that is more commonly encountered in field emission measurements.
Finally, an observed hysteretic behaviour in CNT field emission was explored. The field emitters were subjected to a number of tests. These included; in-situ residual gas analysis of the gas species in the emitter environment, a stability study in which the emitters were exposed to a continuing voltage loop for 50 cycles, differing applied voltage times to analyse the effects on the emitted current, and varying maximums of applied field in a search for hysteresis onset information. These studies revealed the candidate in causing the hysteresis is likely to be water vapour that adsorbs on the CNT surface. A six step model if the emission process was made that details how and when the hysteresis is caused.
Keywords
field emission, carbon nanotubes, emitter characteristics, nanomaterials, field enhancement factor, emitter morphology, hysteresis, scanning anode field emission microscopy, parallel plate field emission, material work function
Identifiers
This record's DOI: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.17225
Rights
No Creative Commons licence (All rights reserved), All Rights Reserved
Licence URL: https://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.