Repository logo
 

Moving from frugivory to seed dispersal: incorporating the functional outcomes of interactions in plant-frugivore networks

Published version
Peer-reviewed

Change log

Authors

Simmons, Benno I 
Sutherland, William J 
Dicks, Lynn V 
Albrecht, Jörg 
Farwig, Nina 

Abstract

  1. There is growing interest in understanding the functional outcomes of species interactions in ecological networks. For many mutualistic networks, including pollination and seed dispersal networks, interactions are generally sampled by recording animal foraging visits to plants. However, these visits may not reflect actual pollination or seed dispersal events, despite these typically being the ecological processes of interest.
  2. Frugivorous animals can act as seed dispersers, by swallowing entire fruits and dispersing their seeds, or as pulp peckers or seed predators, by pecking fruits to consume pieces of pulp or seeds. These processes have opposing consequences for plant reproductive success. Therefore, equating visitation with seed dispersal could lead to biased inferences about the ecology, evolution and conservation of seed dispersal mutualisms.
  3. Here we use natural history information on the functional outcomes of pairwise bird-plant interactions to examine changes in the structure of seven European plant-frugivore visitation networks after non-mutualistic interactions (pulp-pecking and seed predation) have been removed. Following existing knowledge of the contrasting structures of mutualistic and antagonistic networks, we hypothesised a number of changes following interaction removal, such as increased nestedness and lower specialisation.
  4. Non-mutualistic interactions with pulp peckers and seed predators occurred in all seven networks, accounting for 21–48% of all interactions and 6–24% of total interaction frequency. When non-mutualistic interactions were removed, there were significant increases in network-level metrics such as connectance and nestedness, while robustness decreased. These changes were generally small, homogenous and driven by decreases in network size. Conversely, changes in species-level metrics were more variable and sometimes large, with significant decreases in plant degree, interaction frequency, specialisation and resilience to animal extinctions, and significant increases in frugivore species strength.
  5. Visitation data can overestimate the actual frequency of seed dispersal services in plant-frugivore networks. We show here that incorporating natural history information on the functions of species interactions can bring us closer to understanding the processes and functions operating in ecological communities. Our categorical approach lays the foundation for future work quantifying functional interaction outcomes along a mutualism–antagonism continuum, as documented in other frugivore faunas.

Description

Keywords

antagonism, ecological networks, fleshy fruits, frugivorous birds, mutualism, mutualistic networks, pulp pecking, seed predation, Animals, Birds, Food Chain, Fruit, Herbivory, Magnoliopsida, Seed Dispersal, Symbiosis

Journal Title

Journal of Animal Ecology

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

1365-2656
1365-2656

Volume Title

Publisher

Wiley
Sponsorship
NERC (1653183)
Natural Environment Research Council (NE/K015419/1)
NERC (NE/L002507/1)
NERC (1653183)
European Commission Horizon 2020 (H2020) Marie Sk?odowska-Curie actions (656572)
NERC (NE/N014472/2)
B.I.S. was supported by the Natural Environment Research Council as part of the Cambridge Earth System Science NERC DTP (NE/L002507/1). J.P.G.‐V. was funded by an Individual Fellowship from the Marie Sklodowska‐Curie Actions (H2020‐MSCA‐IF‐2014‐656572: MobileLinks). D.G. was funded by a grant from the Spanish MinECo (CGL2017‐82847‐P). W.J.S. is funded by Arcadia. N.F. thanks the administration of the Białowieża National Park, the forestry administrations of Białowieża, Hajnówka and Browsk and Polish authorities (Ministry of Environment, GDOS and RDOS) for the permissions to work in Białowieża Forest. J.A. was supported by the German Federal Foundation for Environment (DBU) and by the German Academic Exchange Service in the framework of a post‐doctorate fellowship grant (DAAD, No 91568794). L.V.D. was supported by the Natural Environment Research Council (grants NE/K015419/1 and NE/N014472/1).
Relationships
Is supplemented by: