Process Evaluation of an Evidence-Informed Parenting Support Programme in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa
University of Cambridge
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
MetadataShow full item record
Shenderovich, Y. (2018). Process Evaluation of an Evidence-Informed Parenting Support Programme in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa (Doctoral thesis). https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.26471
Background: Parent behaviours have a long-lasting impact on the health, education, and behaviour of the young people in their care. Group-based parenting interventions are a promising approach to improve parenting, as well as to prevent and reduce physical and emotional maltreatment of children. While a billion of adolescents live in low- and middle- income countries, few evaluations have examined parenting approaches for families with adolescents in these countries. Objectives: This study was nested within a randomised controlled trial of Sinovuyo Teen, a parenting programme for families with adolescents. The trial took place in rural South Africa in 2015-2016 with 552 families in 40 study clusters. Primary intervention outcomes included parenting and child maltreatment. This dissertation aims to: (1) describe the implementation (attendance, engagement, and fidelity) of the intervention delivered within the evaluation, (2) examine if participant characteristics affected attendance and engagement in the intervention, (3) examine if implementation characteristics affected programme results, and (4) examine if participant characteristics affected programme results. Methods: Programme implementation was assessed through observations of all programme group sessions and the records of the implementing organisation. The analyses also draw on participant self-report data from three time-points (baseline, immediate post-test, and follow-up). The data were analysed using a series of correlation and multilevel regression analyses, presented in three papers. Findings: Attendance levels in the intervention were somewhat lower than in previous similar studies, perhaps due to the role of home visits. Generally, more disadvantaged families participated at similar rates as families with more material and social resources. However, a number of factors affected attendance on individual and family levels, e.g. an overcrowded household, and at the community level, e.g. funeral and grant receipt days. Intervention fidelity was similar to the levels reported in high-income countries, thus suggesting that high implementation quality is feasible in a low-resource setting. There was no consistent impact of the variation in participation and implementation on participant outcomes. Baseline risks did not consistently affect variation in treatment effects, confirming recent findings that families at-risk can benefit from parenting support as much or more than less at-risk families.
parenting, child abuse, child maltreatment, adolescents, South Africa, low- and middle-income countries, impact evaluation, randomised trial, process evaluation
My PhD was funded by the Cambridge Commonwealth, European & International Trust. My research was also supported by Smuts Memorial Fund, managed by the University of Cambridge in memory of Jan Christiaan Smuts, Institute of Criminology, and St John’s College, Cambridge. The Sinovuyo Teen Study was funded by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme, UNICEF Innocenti Office of Research, the Leverhulme Trust, the University of Oxford’s ESRC Impact Acceleration Account, and the John Fell Fund.
This record's DOI: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.26471
Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0)
Licence URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: firstname.lastname@example.org