Using Accelerometers to Measure Physical Activity in Older Patients Admitted to Hospital.
Authors
Keevil, Victoria L
White, Tom
Romero-Ortuno, Roman
Deaton, Christi
Publication Date
2018Journal Title
Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res
ISSN
1687-7063
Publisher
Hindawi Limited
Type
Journal Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Hartley, P., Keevil, V. L., Westgate, K., White, T., Brage, S., Romero-Ortuno, R., & Deaton, C. (2018). Using Accelerometers to Measure Physical Activity in Older Patients Admitted to Hospital.. [Journal Article]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3280240
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Low levels of physical activity in older patients during hospitalization have been linked to loss of functional ability. Practical methods of measuring physical activity are needed to better understand this association and to measure the efficacy of interventions. The aims of this study were to evaluate the feasibility of using accelerometers to discriminate between lying, sitting, standing, and standing and moving and to determine the acceptability of the method from the patients' perspective. METHODS: A convenience sample of 24 inpatients was recruited. Participants wore accelerometers on their thigh and on their lower leg (just above the ankle) for 48 hours during their hospitalization. Postural changes and movement during the 48 hours were differentiated using derived pitch angles of the lower leg and thigh, and nongravity vector magnitude of the lower leg, respectively. RESULTS: On average, patients were lying for 61.2% of the recording time, sitting for 35.6%, standing but not moving 2.1%, and standing and moving 1.1%. All participants found the accelerometers acceptable to wear. CONCLUSIONS: The methodology described in this study can be used to differentiate between lying, sitting, standing, and moving and is acceptable from a hospitalized older person's perspective.
Keywords
1103 Clinical Sciences, Clinical, Clinical Medicine and Science, Bioengineering, Assistive Technology, Prevention, Clinical Research
Sponsorship
This feasibility study was part of PH’s Addenbrooke’s Charitable Trust/NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) Internal Research Fellowship and completed as part of his Dunhill Medical Trust Research Training Fellowship [grant number: RTF115/0117]. The work of KW and SB was supported by the Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12015/3] and the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Cambridge [IS-BRC-1215-20014]. TW was supported by a PhD studentship from MedImmune Ltd.
Funder references
Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12015/3)
National Institute for Health Research (IS-BRC-1215-20014)
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3280240
This record's DOI: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.31549
Rights
Rights Holder: Copyright © 2018 Peter Hartley et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk