Social determinants of prostate cancer in the Caribbean: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
View / Open Files
Authors
Brown, CR
Hambleton, I
Hercules, SM
Unwin, NC
Murphy, MM
Nigel Harris, E
Wilks, R
MacLeish, M
Sullivan, L
Sobers-Grannum, N
Publication Date
2018-07-20Journal Title
BMC Public Health
ISSN
1471-2458
Publisher
BioMed Central
Volume
18
Number
900
Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Brown, C., Hambleton, I., Hercules, S., Unwin, N., Murphy, M., Nigel Harris, E., Wilks, R., et al. (2018). Social determinants of prostate cancer in the Caribbean: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. BMC Public Health, 18 (900) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5696-y
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Prostate cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths among Caribbean men. However, little data exists on the influence of social factors on prostate cancer in the Caribbean setting. This article supports the 2011 Rio Political Declaration on addressing health inequalities by presenting a systematic review of evidence on the role of social determinants on prostate cancer in Caribbean men. It aims to determine the distribution, by known social determinants of health, of the frequency and adverse outcomes of prostate cancer among Caribbean populations.
METHODS:
Observational studies reporting an association between a social determinant and prostate cancer frequency and outcomes were sought in MEDLINE, EMBASE, SciELO, CINAHL, CUMED, LILACS, and IBECS databases. Fourteen social determinants and 7 prostate cancer endpoints were chosen, providing 98 possible relationship groups exploring the role of social determinants on prostate cancer. Observational studies with > 50 participants conducted in Caribbean territories between 2004 and 2016 were eligible. The review was conducted according to STROBE and PRISMA guidelines. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed.
RESULTS:
From 843 potentially relevant citations, 13 articles from 9 studies were included. From these included studies, 24 relationships were reported looking at 11 distinct relationship groups, leaving 90 relationship groups (92% of all relationship groups) unexplored. Study heterogeneity and risk of bias restricted results to a narrative synthesis in most instances. Meta-analyses showed more diagnosed prostate cancer among men with less formal education (n = 2 studies, OR 1.60, 95%CI 1.18-2.19) and among men who were married (n = 3 studies, OR 1.54, 95%CI 1.22-1.95).
CONCLUSIONS:
This review highlights limited evidence for a higher occurrence of diagnosed prostate cancer among Caribbean men with lower levels of education and among men who are married. The role of social determinants on prostate cancer among Caribbean men remains poorly understood. Improvements in study quantity and quality, and reduced variability in outcomes and reporting are needed. This report represents the current evidence, and provides a roadmap to future research priorities for a better understanding of Caribbean prostate cancer inequalities.
Keywords
Caribbean, Disparity, Inequality, Prostate cancer, Social determinants, Systematic review, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Caribbean Region, Cause of Death, Cross-Sectional Studies, Ethnicity, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prevalence, Prospective Studies, Prostatic Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Social Determinants of Health, Socioeconomic Factors
Sponsorship
This study was fully supported by grant number U24MD006959 from the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities.
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5696-y
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/284577
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk