Management of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury at the Emergency Department and Hospital Admission in Europe: A Survey of 71 Neurotrauma Centers Participating in the CENTER-TBI Study.
View / Open Files
Authors
Foks, Kelly A
Cnossen, Maryse C
Dippel, Diederik WJ
Maas, Andrew IR
van der Naalt, Joukje
Steyerberg, Ewout W
Lingsma, Hester F
Polinder, Suzanne
Publication Date
2017-09-01Journal Title
J Neurotrauma
ISSN
0897-7151
Publisher
Mary Ann Liebert Inc
Volume
34
Issue
17
Pages
2529-2535
Language
eng
Type
Article
Physical Medium
Print-Electronic
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Foks, K. A., Cnossen, M. C., Dippel, D. W., Maas, A. I., Menon, D., van der Naalt, J., Steyerberg, E. W., et al. (2017). Management of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury at the Emergency Department and Hospital Admission in Europe: A Survey of 71 Neurotrauma Centers Participating in the CENTER-TBI Study.. J Neurotrauma, 34 (17), 2529-2535. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2016.4919
Abstract
Previous studies have indicated that there is no consensus about management of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) at the emergency department (ED) and during hospital admission. We aim to study variability between management policies for TBI patients at the ED and at the hospital ward across Europe. Centers participating in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study received questionnaires about different phases of TBI care. These questionnaires included 71 questions about TBI management at the ED and at the hospital ward. We found differences in how centers defined mTBI. For example, 40 centers (59%) defined mTBI as a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score between 13 and 15 and 26 (38%) defined it as a GCS score between 14 and 15. At the ED various guidelines for the use of head computed tomography (CT) in mTBI patients were used; 32 centers (49%) used national guidelines, 10 centers (15%) local guidelines, and 14 centers (21%) used no guidelines at all. Also, differences in indication for admission between centers were found. After ED discharge, 7 centers (10%) scheduled a routine follow-up appointment, whereas 38 (54%) did so only after ward admission. In conclusion, large between-center variation exists in policies for diagnostics, admission, and discharge decisions in patients with mTBI at the ED and in the hospital. Guidelines are not always operational in centers, and reported policies systematically diverge from what is recommended in those guidelines. The results of this study may be useful in the understanding of mTBI care in Europe and show the need for further studies on the effectiveness of different policies on outcome.
Keywords
admission, emergency department, guideline, survey, traumatic brain injury
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2016.4919
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/285483
Rights
Licence:
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk