The impact of surface roughness geometry on aero-engine intakes at incidence
View / Open Files
Authors
Coles, C
Babinsky, H
Platt, E
Sheaf, C
Publication Date
2018-01-08Journal Title
AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2018
Conference Name
2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting
ISBN
9781624105241
Publisher
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Issue
210059
Type
Conference Object
This Version
AM
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Coles, C., Babinsky, H., Platt, E., & Sheaf, C. (2018). The impact of surface roughness geometry on aero-engine intakes at incidence. AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2018, (210059) https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-1516
Abstract
© 2018, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA. All rights reserved. Shock Wave-Boundary-Layer Interactions, or SBLI’s, are known to form on engine inlets within a complex transonic flow-field during typical take-off and climb configurations. On the engine inlet, there are a number of potential sources of surface roughness, such as novel de-icing and acoustic systems, or surface contamination. The impact on the flow-field structure, as a result of this roughness, may lead to detrimental side effects, such as losses in engine efficiency or intake flow stability. Previous research into two-dimensional roughness shapes demonstrated flow-field changes, for example a thicker downstream-boundary layer compared to a smooth surface. This paper compares the impact of a two-dimensional ridge roughness to a three-dimensional cubed roughness on the inlet flow-field. The effect of these rough surfaces is examined with schlieren photography and Laser Doppler Velocime-try (LDV) techniques. At an on-design condition, a rough surface promotes a smaller supersonic region, and a thicker boundary-layer downstream of the interaction compared to a smooth surface. At off-design upper surface mass flow rate conditions, modelling a higher mass flow engine demand, the supersonic region grows, leading to a shock location further downstream. Under these conditions, roughness also promotes a thicker downstream boundary-layer. However, comparing the two-dimensional with three-dimensional roughness at an approximate fan-face location, shows that three-dimensional roughness is more benign for all off-design cases. This suggests that the topology of the roughness is influencing the condition of the boundary-layer at this location.
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-1516
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/286609
Rights
Licence:
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk