GEORGE KUBLER AND THE BIOLOGICAL METAPHOR OF ART
View / Open Files
Authors
Nanay, Bence
Journal Title
British Journal of Aesthetics
ISSN
1468-2842
Publisher
OUP
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Nanay, B. GEORGE KUBLER AND THE BIOLOGICAL METAPHOR OF ART. British Journal of Aesthetics https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.35233
Abstract
George Kubler was one of the most important art historians of the 20th century, who is especially relevant today mainly for shifting the emphasis from high art to what is now known as ‘visual culture’ and for being the first genuinely global art historian. But what he has been most widely known for is the rejection of the biological metaphor of art: the general idea that artistic styles and movements grow, flower and then wither away. I argue that Kubler did not in fact reject the biological metaphor of art, but rather replaced a pre-Darwinian biological metaphor with a post-Darwinian one, which bears remarkable similarities to Ernst Mayr’s concept of population thinking, developed exactly at the time when Kubler wrote The Shape of Time. Importantly, Kubler’s post-Darwinian biological metaphor seriously can help us to understand his distinctive art historical explanatory scheme.
Sponsorship
ERC, FWO
Identifiers
This record's DOI: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.35233
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/287920
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.