Managing Sociotechnical Complexity in Engineering Design Projects
View / Open Files
Authors
Hassannezhad, M
Cantamessa, M
Montagna, F
John Clarkson, P
Publication Date
2019Journal Title
Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME
ISSN
1050-0472
Publisher
ASME International
Volume
141
Issue
8
Type
Article
This Version
AM
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Hassannezhad, M., Cantamessa, M., Montagna, F., & John Clarkson, P. (2019). Managing Sociotechnical Complexity in Engineering Design Projects. Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME, 141 (8) https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4042614
Abstract
<jats:p>Design project management is witnessing an increasing need for practitioners to rely on tools that reflect the integrated nature of the social and technical characteristics of design processes, as opposed to considering the two as separate concepts. For practitioners, this integration has the potential value of predicting the future behavior of design processes by allowing them to understand what task to do next, whom to assign a task given the availability of resource, and the levels of knowledge and expertise required. In response to these challenges, this paper contributes to the development of a new process modeling method, called actor-based signposting (ABS), that looks at the early stages of the product development processes from the perspective of integrated sociotechnical systems. The objective is to support managers and decision-makers on both typical planning issues, such as scheduling and resource allocation, and less conventional issues relating to the organizational planning of a design project, such as identification of criticalities, matching required skills and expertise, and factors of influence. Ultimately, the aim is to support organizations to be more adaptive in responding to change and uncertainty. Two case studies in the automotive and aerospace industries with different properties and modeling objectives were selected to demonstrate the utility of the proposed method. Experimental analysis of these cases led to a range of insights regarding the future of modeling for academia as well as the decision-making capabilities for managers and practitioners.</jats:p>
Sponsorship
Technology Strategy Board (110123)
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4042614
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/288214
Rights
Licence:
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk