Why? (Editorial) (Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages)
dc.contributor.author | Dixon, Martin | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-06-26T10:12:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-06-26T10:12:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0010-8200 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/294033 | |
dc.description.abstract | Considers the interpretation of the Land Registration Act 2002 and the law of overriding interests | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Sweet & Maxwell | |
dc.subject | Contracts for sale of land | |
dc.subject | Divisible contracts | |
dc.subject | Equity release schemes | |
dc.subject | Judicial comment | |
dc.subject | Land registration | |
dc.subject | Leaseback | |
dc.subject | Obiter dicta | |
dc.subject | Proprietary rights | |
dc.title | Why? (Editorial) (Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages) | |
dc.type | Article | |
prism.endingPage | 465 | |
prism.publicationDate | 2014 | |
prism.publicationName | Conveyancer and Property Lawyer | |
prism.startingPage | 461 | |
prism.volume | 6 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.17863/CAM.41139 | |
rioxxterms.version | AM | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2014 | |
dc.contributor.orcid | Dixon, Martin [0000-0001-5805-3699] | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Cambridge University Research Outputs
Research outputs of the University of Cambridge