Why? (Editorial) (Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages)

Thumbnail
View / Open Files
Authors
  Dixon, Martin
Publication Date
2014
Journal Title
Conveyancer and Property Lawyer
ISSN
0010-8200
Publisher
Sweet & Maxwell
Volume
6
Pages
461-465
Language
English
Type
Article
This Version
AM
Metadata
Show full item record
Citation
Dixon, M. (2014). Why? (Editorial) (Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages). Conveyancer and Property Lawyer, 6 461-465. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.41139
Abstract
Considers the interpretation of the Land Registration Act 2002 and the law of overriding interests
Keywords
Contracts for sale of land, Divisible contracts, Equity release schemes, Judicial comment, Land registration, Leaseback, Obiter dicta, Proprietary rights
Identifiers
This record's DOI: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.41139
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/294033


Rights
Licence:
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved