Why? (Editorial) (Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages)
View / Open Files
Authors
Dixon, MJ
Publication Date
2014Journal Title
Conveyancer and Property Lawyer
ISSN
0010-8200
Publisher
Sweet & Maxwell
Volume
6
Pages
461-465
Language
English
Type
Article
This Version
AM
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Dixon, M. (2014). Why? (Editorial) (Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages). Conveyancer and Property Lawyer, 6 461-465. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.41139
Abstract
Considers the interpretation of the Land Registration Act 2002 and the law of overriding interests
Keywords
Contracts for sale of land, Divisible contracts, Equity release schemes, Judicial comment, Land registration, Leaseback, Obiter dicta, Proprietary rights
Identifiers
This record's DOI: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.41139
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/294033
Rights
Licence:
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk