Repository logo
 

On the Affective Salience of Doctrines

Accepted version
Peer-reviewed

No Thumbnail Available

Type

Article

Change log

Authors

Abstract

In his classic study, The Nature of Doctrine, George Lindbeck articulates an account of Christian doctrinal statements as fundamentally ‘regulative’ in nature. In his view, the best way to understand ‘church doctrines’ is in terms of ‘their use, not as expressive symbols or truth claims, but as communally authoritative rules of discourse, attitude, and action.’1 A religion, Lindbeck tells us, is first and foremost ‘a kind of cultural and/or linguistic framework or medium that shapes the entirety of life and thought,’ and church doctrines make up a significant part of that cultural‐linguistic framework. As Mike Higton explains, this means that ‘to understand any [doctrinal] proposition one must attend to the weave of practice within which it is made’, and ‘attend[ ] to the way [religious truth claims] are involved in the whole shaping of communal and individual life.’

Description

Keywords

5003 Philosophy, 5004 Religious Studies, 5005 Theology, 50 Philosophy and Religious Studies

Journal Title

Modern Theology

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

0266-7177
1468-0025

Volume Title

31

Publisher

Wiley

Rights

All rights reserved