Repository logo
 

France removes state funding for dementia drugs

Accepted version
Peer-reviewed

No Thumbnail Available

Type

Article

Change log

Authors

Walsh, Sebastian 
King, Elizabeth 

Abstract

In May 2018 the French minister of health announced the delisting of drug treatments for dementia; payments for memantine and the acetylcholinesterase inhibitors donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine would no longer be reimbursed by the state. The decision followed a long campaign by the French therapeutics journal Prescrire, which subsequently declared, “The days are over when support for patients and their struggling caregivers was based on drugs raising false hopes.”i The following month, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) published updated dementia guidance.ii This recommended combination therapy for the first time, advised not stopping drugs simply because the condition progressed, and relaxed regulations on primary care prescribing. In short, drugs for dementia would no longer be supported in France but would be further promoted in England and Wales. France is the only European country to take this step,iii although authorities in Belgium are considering following suit.iv Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors inhibit the breakdown of acetylcholine, a key neurotransmitter involved in memory, attention, and sleep that is often depleted in adults with dementia.v Memantine works on a different and less well understood target thought to be involved with cognitive decline, blocking N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors to prevent toxic overstimulation and subsequent neuronal damage.vi Alzheimer’s dementia is the only licensed indication for these drugs, but NICE recommends off licence use for adults with dementia with Lewy bodies and frontotemporal dementia.2 No other drugs are available for any of the common dementia subtypes, and disease modifying agents remain elusive.vii These drugs are therefore the only available pharmacological treatments for dementia. The French health authorities cite several reasons for their decision, including concerns about the clinical meaningfulness of their effects on cognition, no proved benefit for behavioural symptoms, quality of life, or time to institutionalisation, and real world indications of a rare but increased risk of bradycardia requiring hospital admission.viii

Description

Keywords

Cost-Benefit Analysis, Dementia, Financial Support, France, Health Policy, Humans, Nootropic Agents, Quality-Adjusted Life Years

Journal Title

BMJ

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

0959-8146
1756-1833

Volume Title

367

Publisher

BMJ

Rights

All rights reserved