Legitimacy, Inequality, and Conceptions of Democratic Crisis
View / Open Files
Authors
Studebaker, Benjamin
Advisors
Runciman, David
Thompson, Helen
Date
2019-10Awarding Institution
University of Cambridge
Qualification
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Type
Thesis
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Studebaker, B. (2019). Legitimacy, Inequality, and Conceptions of Democratic Crisis (Doctoral thesis). https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.54521
Abstract
This thesis explores the relationship between legitimacy and inequality in well-established, embedded democracies by considering inequality as a potential cause of legitimacy crises. In the first chapter, the thesis reviews rival accounts of how to conceptualise political legitimacy and of what poses a threat to it. In subsequent chapters, it syncretises these accounts together. The second chapter argues that legitimacy crises are created by resentment, i.e. inability on the part of the subjects themselves to identify with the state’s actions. It also argues that legitimacy crises need not be acute crises in which the regime’s survival is imminently threatened but can instead be chronic crises in which the political debate increasingly focuses on how the state makes decisions rather than merely what decisions it makes. The third chapter discusses how a state that has entered a chronic legitimacy crisis might get out of it. It proposes that resentment is driven by gaps between perceived conditions and expectations, and therefore states can “solve” legitimacy crises by changing the perception of conditions or “settle” them by adjusting expectations. Finally, it argues that solving and settling strategies can feed off each other in a vicious cycle, producing “sinking”, in which resentment persists or worsens. The fourth chapter then applies the model produced in the second and third chapters to inequality, showing how certain forms of inequality can give rise to a chronic crisis and prove intractable enough that they result in sinking.
Keywords
Legitimacy, Inequality, Democracy, Crisis, Political Theory
Embargo Lift Date
2400-01-01
Identifiers
This record's DOI: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.54521
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk