Faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) versus colonoscopy for surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness study.

Cross, Amanda J; Wooldrage, Kate; Robbins, Emma C; Kralj-Hans, Ines; MacRae, Eilidh; Piggott, Carolyn; Stenson, Iain; Prendergast, Aaron; Patel, Bhavita; Pack, Kevin; Howe, Rosemary; Swart, Nicholas; Snowball, Julia; Duffy, Stephen W; Morris, Stephen; von Wagner, Christian; Halloran, Stephen P; Atkin, Wendy S

View / Open Files

Published version (PDF, 647Kb)

Authors

Cross, Amanda J

Wooldrage, Kate

Robbins, Emma C

Kralj-Hans, Ines

MacRae, Eilidh

Piggott, Carolyn

Stenson, Iain

Publication Date

2019-09

Journal Title

Gut

ISSN

0017-5749

Volume

Issue

Pages

1642-1652

Language

eng

Type

Article

This Version

VoR

Physical Medium

Print-Electronic

Metadata

Show full item record

Citation

Cross, A. J., Wooldrage, K., Robbins, E. C., Kralj-Hans, I., MacRae, E., Piggott, C., Stenson, I., et al. (2019). Faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) versus colonoscopy for surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness study.. Gut, 68 (9), 1642-1652. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317297

Keywords

Humans, Adenoma, Colorectal Neoplasms, Colonic Polyps, False Negative Reactions, Colonoscopy, Occult Blood, Population Surveillance, Sensitivity and Specificity, Predictive Value of Tests, Aged, Middle Aged, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Health Care Costs, England, Female, Male, Early Detection of Cancer

Identifiers

External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317297

This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/310182

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

Licence URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution 4.0 International