3 T: the good, the bad and the ugly.
Br J Radiol
British Institute of Radiology
MetadataShow full item record
Graves, M. J. (2022). 3 T: the good, the bad and the ugly.. Br J Radiol, 20210708. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20210708
It is around 20 years since the first commercial 3 T MRI systems became available. The theoretical promise of twice the signal-to-noise ratio of a 1.5 T system together with a greater sensitivity to magnetic susceptibility-related contrast mechanisms, such as the blood oxygen level dependent effect that is the basis for functional MRI, drove the initial market in neuroradiology. However, the limitations of the increased field strength soon became apparent, including the increased radiofrequency power deposition, tissue-dependent changes in relaxation times, increased artifacts, and greater safety concerns. Many of these issues are dependent upon MR physics and workarounds have had to be developed to try and mitigate their effects. This article reviews the underlying principles of the good, the bad and the ugly aspects of 3 T, discusses some of the methods used to improve image quality and explains the remaining challenges and concerns.
Adipose Tissue, Artifacts, Body Water, Brain, Burns, Hot Temperature, Humans, Magnetic Fields, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Magnets, Radio Waves, Signal-To-Noise Ratio, Superconductivity, Time Factors, Torque
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (CUH) (146281)
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20210708
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/330631
All rights reserved
Licence URL: http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: email@example.com