Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBales, Adam
dc.contributor.authorHandfield, T
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-22T14:44:32Z
dc.date.available2021-11-22T14:44:32Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-18
dc.date.submitted2020-05-08
dc.identifier.issn0039-7857
dc.identifier.others11229-020-03005-3
dc.identifier.other3005
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/330876
dc.description.abstract<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Why should we typically act in accordance with our resolutions when faced with the temptation to do otherwise? A much-maligned view suggests that we should do so because resolutions themselves provide us with reasons for action. We defend a version of this view, on which resolutions provide <jats:italic>second-order</jats:italic> reasons. This account avoids the objections typically taken to be fatal for the view that resolutions are reasons, including the prominent bootstrapping objections.</jats:p>
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectResolutions
dc.subjectTemptation
dc.subjectReasons
dc.subjectBootstrapping arguments
dc.titleResolutions provide reasons or: “how the Cookie Monster quit cookies”
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2021-11-22T14:44:31Z
prism.endingPage4840
prism.issueIdentifier1-2
prism.publicationNameSynthese
prism.startingPage4829
prism.volume199
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.78319
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-12-21
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1007/s11229-020-03005-3
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.contributor.orcidBales, Adam [0000-0002-9629-0318]
dc.identifier.eissn1573-0964
pubs.funder-project-idAustralian Research Council (FT180100067)
cam.issuedOnline2021-01-18


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record