Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChristie, Alec
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Philip A
dc.contributor.authorPetrovan, Silviu
dc.contributor.authorBladon, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorBowkett, Andrew E
dc.contributor.authorLittlewood, Nick A
dc.contributor.authorMupepele, Anne-Christine
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorSainsbury, Katherine A
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Nigel G
dc.contributor.authorSutherland, William
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-06T12:54:59Z
dc.date.available2022-01-06T12:54:59Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn2167-8359
dc.identifier.otherPMC8519180
dc.identifier.other34721971
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/332202
dc.description.abstractEvidence-based decision-making is most effective with comprehensive access to scientific studies. If studies face significant publication delays or barriers, the useful information they contain may not reach decision-makers in a timely manner. This represents a potential problem for mission-oriented disciplines where access to the latest data is required to ensure effective actions are undertaken. We sought to analyse the severity of publication delay in conservation science-a field that requires urgent action to prevent the loss of biodiversity. We used the Conservation Evidence database to assess the length of publication delay (time from finishing data collection to publication) in the literature that tests the effectiveness of conservation interventions. From 7,447 peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed studies of conservation interventions published over eleven decades, we find that the raw mean publication delay was 3.2 years (±2SD = 0.1) and varied by conservation subject. A significantly shorter delay was observed for studies focused on Bee Conservation, Sustainable Aquaculture, Management of Captive Animals, Amphibian Conservation, and Control of Freshwater Invasive Species (Estimated Marginal Mean range from 1.4-1.9 years). Publication delay was significantly shorter for the non-peer-reviewed literature (Estimated Marginal Mean delay of 1.9 years ± 0.2) compared to the peer-reviewed literature (i.e., scientific journals; Estimated Marginal Mean delay of 3.0 years ± 0.1). We found publication delay has significantly increased over time (an increase of ~1.2 years from 1912 (1.4 years ± 0.2) to 2020 (2.6 years ± 0.1)), but this change was much weaker and non-significant post-2000s; we found no evidence for any decline. There was also no evidence that studies on more threatened species were subject to a shorter delay-indeed, the contrary was true for mammals, and to a lesser extent for birds. We suggest a range of possible ways in which scientists, funders, publishers, and practitioners can work together to reduce delays at each stage of the publication process.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherPeerJ
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceessn: 2167-8359
dc.sourcenlmid: 101603425
dc.subjectEvidence-based
dc.subjectPeer-review
dc.subjectScience-practice Gap
dc.subjectConservation Science
dc.subjectConservation Evidence
dc.subjectPublication Delay
dc.subjectScience-policy Gap
dc.subjectJournal Delay
dc.subjectPublication Speed
dc.titleReducing publication delay to improve the efficiency and impact of conservation science.
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2022-01-06T12:54:59Z
prism.publicationNamePeerJ
prism.volume9
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.79648
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-09-13
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.7717/peerj.12245
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.contributor.orcidChristie, Alec [0000-0002-8465-8410]
dc.contributor.orcidWhite, Thomas [0000-0002-0536-6162]
dc.contributor.orcidMartin, Philip A [0000-0002-5346-8868]
dc.contributor.orcidPetrovan, Silviu [0000-0002-3984-2403]
dc.contributor.orcidBladon, Andrew [0000-0002-2677-1247]
dc.contributor.orcidMupepele, Anne-Christine [0000-0002-5671-0963]
dc.contributor.orcidRocha, Ricardo [0000-0003-2757-7347]
dc.contributor.orcidSainsbury, Katherine A [0000-0002-5087-3892]
dc.contributor.orcidSmith, Rebecca [0000-0003-3294-7592]
dc.contributor.orcidSutherland, William [0000-0002-6498-0437]
dc.identifier.eissn2167-8359
pubs.funder-project-idNERC (1945942)
pubs.funder-project-idNERC (NE/L002507/1)
cam.issuedOnline2021-10-12


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution 4.0 International