A Unified Turbine Preliminary Design Study
View / Open Files
Authors
Kaufmann, Shaun Michael
Advisors
Xu, Liping
Date
2020-11-01Awarding Institution
University of Cambridge
Qualification
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Type
Thesis
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Kaufmann, S. M. (2020). A Unified Turbine Preliminary Design Study (Doctoral thesis). https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.81122
Abstract
During the preliminary stages of design, designers must make decisions concerning size,
speed and machine type. Misinformed choices in design parameters and architecture can lock in
suboptimal performance. Design charts leveraging similitude are powerful tools that can help
designers make better decisions at this point in the design process. The design charts used up
until now are either partially or entirely based on lost correlations and do not include mixed flow
architectures. On top of this many of the current charts contain little to no information about the
various loss mechanisms, turbine characteristics and how both change through out the design
parameter space. This thesis builds on the pre existing work by mapping out design parameter
spaces using computation methods, more specifically using a Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes
Equation Solver. This also allowed for the partial decoupling of loss mechanisms.
This thesis includes a unified design methodology built around a unified set of design flow
parameters. This was used to generate design charts for all architecture types, including radially
fibred mixed flow architectures with fixed cone angle and radius ratio. Both total to static
and total to total efficiency was presented as a function of loading coefficient and duty flow
coefficient instead of the typically used non dimensional speed and diameter. This was done in
order to help aid in the aerodynamic interpretation of the data.
Results showed the shapes of the design spaces in the present framework can largely be
explained by surface dissipation. That is, entropy generated at the surface is proportional to
the surface velocity cubed with a fixed dissipation coefficient. A universal trend across all
architectures was found. Turbines with high duty flow coefficient have characteristically high
surface velocities and turbines with lower values of duty flow coefficient are characterised by
high surface area. However, the balance between area and surface velocity of the different
architectures differed significantly. Axial turbines have characteristically high surface velocities.
Whereas radial turbines have characteristically high surface area and lower surface velocities.
The lower surface velocities of the radial turbine was in part due to the centrifugal loading.
It was shown that shifting loading from the relative acceleration term to the centrifugal term
decreases relative passage velocities.
It was shown that axial turbines have the broadest range across the design space, both the
constrained mixed flow and radial turbines sit inside the axial space. In addition to this, axial
architectures did not show a performance boundary at lower duty flow coefficients. This was
attributed to the aspect ratio being fixed and other tolerances based geometric features scaling
with the passage. The mixed and radial architectures were shown to suffer high losses at lower
duty flow coefficients, this was attributed to the high end wall surface area, characteristic of
designs in this region of the Balje chart.
iv
All turbines suffer a drop off in performance at high duty flow with all mechanisms con tributing to this. The characteristically high velocities of these designs result in high profile and
end wall surface dissipation loss. In addition the leakage loss increases in part due to the high
velocity with which the leakage flow is mixing and the high over tip driving pressure. Radial
architectures show a sharper drop in performance with increasing duty flow. This was attributed
to flow separation at the casing due to reducing radius of curvature. By virtue of having a
lower cone angle, the mixed flow architecture have a significantly larger radius of curvature
and did not exbibit any signs of flow separation. As expected the (radially fibred) mixed flow
architectures have lower performance loss with increasing loading coefficients than the (radially
fibred) radial architectures due to the inlet metal angle not being constrained. However axial
architectures outperform both. When comparing the mixed and axial flow architectures the
mixed flow architectures showed a sharper increase in surface area with increasing loading.
Keywords
Turbine, Gas Turbine, Design space, non dimensional, Design methodology, Preliminary Design, Loading coefficient, flow coefficient
Sponsorship
EPSRC
Funder references
EPSRC (1493698)
Identifiers
This record's DOI: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.81122
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.