EdTech for Ugandan girls: Affordances of different technologies for girls’ secondary education during the Covid‐19 pandemic
View / Open Files
Publication Date
2022-01-18Journal Title
Development Policy Review
ISSN
0950-6764
Publisher
Wiley
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Damani, K., Daltry, R., Jordan, K., Hills, L., & Evans, L. (2022). EdTech for Ugandan girls: Affordances of different technologies for girls’ secondary education during the Covid‐19 pandemic. Development Policy Review https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12619
Abstract
Background
This article discusses the use of educational technology (EdTech) in girls’ education at PEAS schools (‘Promoting Education in African Schools’) in rural Uganda during the COVID-19-related school closures.
Purpose
This paper addresses a research gap surrounding the potential use of EdTech to support girls’ education, focusing on the barriers to girls’ EdTech use and how technology might be used to enhance girls’ education in disadvantaged rural areas – specifically their academic learning and their social and emotional learning.
Approach and Methods
A sequential, explanatory mixed-methods case study approach was used. Quantitative exploration of a dataset of 483 Ugandan students, from 28 PEAS schools, was first conducted, followed by interviews with PEAS staff to elucidate the reasons and context behind the findings.
Findings
Findings show female students are less likely than male students to have access to their caregivers’ phones for learning. The form of EdTech that appeared most beneficial for girls’ academic learning was radio; girls also had significantly more interest in tuning into radio broadcasts than boys did. Also, poorer boys were more likely to be inspired by SMS messages than wealthier boys. Apart from gender-based differences, students with more highly educated parents found SMS messages more helpful, and phone calls from teachers appeared to help boost younger students’ self-confidence.
Policy Implications
The findings suggest that policymakers need to: carefully consider provision of education through multiple modes of EdTech in order to ensure that it reaches all students; ensure that caregivers are involved in the strategies developed for girls’ education; make EdTech interventions interactive; and consider language in EdTech interventions. Given the gender differences which emerged, the findings are of relevance both to supporting the continuation of educational provision during periods of school closure, and also in terms of finding additional ways to support girls’ education alongside formal schooling.
Sponsorship
FCDO (via Results for Development) (R4D-000675)
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12619
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/333866
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.