Periphrasis and inflexion: lessons from Romance
View / Open Files
Editors
Ledgeway, Adam
Smith, John Charles
Vincent, Nigel
Publication Date
2022-03-03ISBN
9780198870807
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Number
1
Type
Book chapter
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Ledgeway, A., & Vincent, N. (2022). Periphrasis and inflexion: lessons from Romance. In Ledgeway, Adam. Oxford University Press, Periphrasis and Inflexion in Diachrony: a View from Romance. [Book chapter]. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.82273
Abstract
Evidence from the Romance languages has played a central role in linguistic debates regarding the relation between structure and change. One of the issues that has attracted most attention has been the connection between periphrasis and inflexion: Latin had rich systems of verbal and nominal inflexion that interacted in various ways with existing periphrastic patterns and structures that incorporated the ingredients of incipient Romance periphrases. These structures are of interest not only to those whose principal focus lies in exploring and explaining the development of the Romance languages, but also to those whose concern is with the broader theoretical implications for our understanding of language structure, variation, and change. This chapter sets out the issues, both theoretical — what models are most appropriate to describe and explain the Romance data? — and empirical — what sources of data are available and what issues arise in exploiting them? We begin with the criteria that serve to distinguish analytic patterns in general before going on to examine the specific properties of periphrastic constructions. From there we consider the interface between periphrasis and inflexion and the different ways they are modelled in current theoretical work. From synchrony we move to diachrony and the role of grammaticalization in the genesis of new periphrases and inflexions, and interaction on the one hand between internally and externally motivated change and on the other between reconstructed and attested patterns. We conclude with some general reflections on the relation between synchrony and diachrony.
Embargo Lift Date
2024-03-03
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.82273
This record's DOI: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.82273
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk