Repository logo

Information sharing practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study about face masks.

Published version

Change log


So, Emily 


This article contributes an empirical analysis of information sharing practices on Twitter relating to the use of face masks in the context of COVID-19. Behavioural changes, such as the use of face masks, are often influenced by people's knowledge and perceptions, which in turn can be affected by the information available to them. Face masks were not recommended for use by the UK public at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to developments in scientific understanding, the guidance changed and by the end of 2020 they were mandatory on public transport and in shops. This research examines tweets in this longitudinal context and, therefore, provides novel insights into the dynamics of crisis communication in an ongoing crisis event with emerging scientific evidence. Specifically, analysis of the content of tweets, external resources most frequently shared, and users sharing information are considered. The conclusions contribute to developing understanding of the digital information ecology and provide practical insights for crisis communicators. Firstly, the analysis shows changes in the frequency of tweets about the topic correspond with key guidance and policy changes. These are, therefore, points in time official channels of information need to utilise the public's information seeking and sharing practices. Secondly, due to changes in face mask guidance and policy, the current literature on digital information ecology is insufficient for capturing the dynamic nature of a long-term ongoing crisis event. Challenges can arise due to the prolonged circulation of out-of-date information, i.e. not strategic misinformation, nor "mis"-information at all, which can have serious ramifications for crisis communication practitioners. Thirdly, the role of traditional media and other journalism/broadcasting platforms in shaping conversations is evident, as is the potential for scientific organisations' and individual people's Twitter user accounts. This plurality of contributors needs to be acknowledged and understood to inform crisis communication strategies.



Research Article, Social sciences, Computer and information sciences, Medicine and health sciences, Biology and life sciences, Ecology and environmental sciences, Science policy

Journal Title

PLoS One

Conference Name

Journal ISSN


Volume Title



Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Humanities and Social Change International Foundation (Expertise Under Pressure (EuP) project)
Financial Disclosure: Dr Hannah Baker’s and Dr Emily So’s research project is called ‘Expertise Under Pressure’, and Dr Shauna Concannon’s is entitled ‘Giving Voice to Digital Democracies’. Both projects are part of the Centre for Research in the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities (CRASSH) at the University of Cambridge, and funded by the Humanities & Social Change International Foundation ( The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.