Repository logo
 

Brain age prediction and early neurodegeneration detection using contrastive learning on brain biomechanics: a retrospective, multicentre study.

Accepted version
Peer-reviewed

Change log

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the main reasons why drugs for neurodegenerative diseases often fail is that treatment typically begins only after symptoms have appeared-by which point significant, and possibly irreversible, damage may have already occurred. Non-invasive imaging techniques, such as Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), have previously been explored for presymptomatic diagnosis, but with limited success. More recently, Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE)-a technique capable of mapping the brain's biomechanical properties, including stiffness and damping ratio-has shown promise in detecting early changes. However, current studies have been limited by small sample sizes, and a lack of robust algorithms capable of accurately interpreting data under such constraints. METHODS: We developed a self-supervised contrastive regression framework trained on 3D MRE-derived stiffness and damping ratio maps from 311 healthy individuals (aged 14-90) and evaluated its performance against structural 3D T1-weighted MRI. Brain age predictions were used to compute brain age gaps (BAGs), quantifying deviations from normative ageing trajectories. We applied the models to Alzheimer's disease (AD, n = 11) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n = 20) cohorts, and analysed whole-brain and region-specific predictions using occlusion-based saliency maps and subcortical segmentation. FINDINGS: Self-supervised models using MRE achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 3.51 years in brain age prediction-significantly outperforming MRI (MAE: 4.79 years, p < 0.05) under matched conditions. The greater age sensitivity of MRE translated into improved differentiation of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from healthy individuals. Stiffness was the dominant ageing biomarker in AD (BAG increase: +9.2 years, p < 0.05), whereas damping ratio revealed early MCI-related changes (BAG increase: +6.3 years, p < 0.05). Region-wise analysis identified the caudate (stiffness) and thalamus (damping ratio) as key markers for AD and MCI, respectively. Notably, some cognitively normal individuals exhibited biomechanical profiles resembling patients with MCI or AD, suggesting that these individuals may share some biomechanical characteristics with clinical populations. INTERPRETATION: In our controlled experimental setting, MRE combined with contrastive learning provides a sensitive, non-invasive biomarker of brain ageing and neurodegeneration, outperforming MRI and differentiating disease stage-specific biomechanical signatures. Regional BAG profiling may have the potential to identify at-risk, cognitively normal individuals, which could facilitate timely intervention trials in the future, pending longitudinal validation. FUNDING: Gates Cambridge Trust; Cambridge Centre for Data-Driven Discovery (Schmidt Sciences); Wellcome Trust; NIH (R01-AG058853, U01-NS112120); UK EPSRC; UK MRC; Alzheimer's Research UK; Michael J. Fox Foundation; Infinitus China Ltd.

Description

Journal Title

EBioMedicine

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

2352-3964
2352-3964

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier

Rights and licensing

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International
Sponsorship
Medical Research Council (MR/K02292X/1)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N014588/1)
Wellcome Trust (203249/Z/16/Z)
EPSRC (EP/S026045/1)
EPSRC (EP/T017961/1)
EPSRC (EP/T003553/1)
Wellcome Trust (215733/Z/19/Z)
EPSRC (EP/V029428/1)
Wellcome Trust (221633/Z/20/Z)
JT acknowledges support from the Gates Cambridge Trust via the Gates Cambridge Scholarship. This project was supported with funding from the Cambridge Centre for Data-Driven Discovery and Accelerate Programme for Scientific Discovery, made possible by a donation from Schmidt Sciences. LVH is supported by the Wellcome Trust (grant number: 226420/Z/22/Z). CJ acknowledges partial support from the National Institutes of Health grants R01-AG058853 and U01-NS112120. CBS acknowledges support from the Philip Leverhulme Prize, the Royal Society Wolfson Fellowship, the EPSRC advanced career fellowship EP/V029428/1, EPSRC grants EP/S026045/1 and EP/T003553/1, EP/N014588/1, EP/T017961/1, the Wellcome Innovator Awards 215733/Z/19/Z and 221633/Z/20/Z, CCMI and the Alan Turing Institute. GSKS acknowledges funding from the Wellcome Trust (065807/Z/01/Z) (203249/Z/16/Z), the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) (MR/K02292X/1), ARUK (ARUK-PG013-14), Michael J Fox Foundation (16238; 022159), and Infinitus China Ltd.