What is a Beautiful Experiment?
Published version
Peer-reviewed
Repository URI
Repository DOI
Change log
Authors
Abstract
AbstractThis article starts an engagement on the aesthetics of experiments and offers an account for analysing how aesthetics features in the design, evaluation and reception of experiments. I identify two dimensions of aesthetic evaluation of experiments: design and significance. When it comes to design, a number of qualities, such as simplicity, economy and aptness, are analysed and illustrated with the famous Meselson-Stahl experiment. Beautiful experiments are also regarded to make significant discoveries, but I argue against a narrow construal of experimental aims. By drawing on the plurality of goals experimenters have and diversity of aesthetic responses, I argue that experiments are aesthetically appreciated both when they discover and when they produce disruptive results.
Description
Acknowledgements: I am grateful to Steven French and Alice Murphy for reading an earlier version of this paper and offering me such enthusiastic comments as well as Hasok Chang and his group of graduate students who discussed the paper with me in their seminar. Many thanks are also due to the two referees for this journal for their encouraging and helpful feedback. I have had the privilege to discuss this work with audiences in Aarhus, Bristol, Cambridge, Geneva, Haifa, Hertfordshire, Kent, Oxford, Turin, and Uppsala, and would like to thank them all for the great discussions.
Journal Title
Conference Name
Journal ISSN
1572-8420