We will be undertaking essential maintenance work on Apollo's infrastructure on Thursday 14 August and Friday 15 August, therefore expect intermittent access to Apollo's content and search interface during that time. Please also note that Apollo's "Request a copy" service will be temporarily disabled while we undertake this work.
Repository logo
 

Urine Glycosaminoglycan Scores for Surveillance of Recurrence in Intermediate and High-risk Non-metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma – An Observational Prospective Multicenter Diagnostic Test Cohort Study

Accepted version
Peer-reviewed

Change log

Authors

Abstract

Background and Objective: Non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (M0ccRCC) recurs 92 in ~20% of patients within 5 years post-surgery. With no biomarkers available, recurrence 93 detection relies on radiological imaging. Urine glycosaminoglycan profiles (GAGomes) were 94 previously associated with M0ccRCC recurrence. We conducted an observational prospective 95 multicenter diagnostic test cohort study to evaluate GAGomes for post-surgery recurrence 96 detection in M0ccRCC. 97 Methods: Postsurgical M0ccRCC patients with Leibovich score (LS) ≥5 points were included. 98 Follow-up imaging up to 18 months assessed radiological recurrence (reference standard). 99 Urine GAGomes were measured every 3 months to compute a GAGome score (index test). 100 Sensitivity and specificity to radiological recurrence were calculated. Lead time between first 101 positive GAGome score and radiological recurrence was estimated. Bayesian joint modeling 102 estimated recurrence-free survival hazard ratio (HR). 103 Key Findings and Limitations: Of 393 patients screened (Jan 2020–Nov 2021), 134 met 104 inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 16 months (IQR:12-18) for those without a recurrence. 105 Sixteen percent had a recurrence. The GAGome score had 90% sensitivity (95% CI:62-100%) 106 and 51% specificity (95%CI:30-71%) to radiological recurrence. The positive and negative 107 predictive values were 26%(95%CI:4-46%) and 97% (95%CI:87-100%), respectively. Median 108 lead time was 4.2 months (IQR:1.6–6.4). A 10-point GAGome score increase was associated 109 with a HR=1.62 (95% high density interval:1.11-2.30) for recurrence. Main limitation was short 110 follow-up time. 111 Conclusions and Clinical Implications: GAGome score had very high sensitivity to ccRCC 112 recurrence, resulting in 97% negative predictive value. External validation foreseen in the study 113 design aims to confirm its utility to personalize M0ccRCC follow-up. 114

Description

Keywords

Journal Title

European urology oncology

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

2588-9311
2588-9311

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier

Publisher DOI

Publisher URL

Rights and licensing

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International
Sponsorship
The AURORAX-0087A study is sponsored by Elypta AB and co-funded by the European Union Horizon 2020 programme (Grant No. 849251). S Dabestani is supported by ALF research grant (‘ALF Yngre Forskare’), Region Skåne and Lund University, Sweden. A.Laird is supported by a Career Research Fellowship from the Chief Scientists Office of the Scottish Government and an MRC Clinical Academic Research Partnership Fellowship. G. D. Stewart is supported by The Mark Foundation for Cancer Research, the Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre (C9685/A25177 and CTRQQR-2021\100012), and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203312)