The role of the IPCC in assessing actionable evidence for climate policymaking

Published version
Repository DOI

Change log
Authors
Mercure, Jean-Francois  ORCID logo  https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2620-9200
Barker, Terry 
Salas, Pablo 
Abstract

jats:titleAbstract</jats:title>jats:pClimate policymakers across the world seek inputs from the research community to determine appropriate policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, the reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which perform the largest available analytical exercise in this area, offer scarce analytics on climate policy design. Here, we explore how, despite its ‘neutral, policy-relevant but not policy-prescriptive’ principle, the IPCC’s analytical scenario process in Working Group III on Mitigation has adopted an implicitly prescriptive policy position in favour of carbon pricing. Drawing on the example of alternative climate-economic modelling using the E3ME-FTT framework, we explore a pathway for the IPCC process that could cater for diverse ranges of more realistic granular policies. We conclude that, to become truly policy-relevant, the IPCC’s climate mitigation work is in urgent need of reform to provide more effective support for policy design.</jats:p>

Description

Acknowledgements: The authors have presented their views in the paper. The views do not necessarily represent those of their employers.

Keywords
38 Economics, 4407 Policy and Administration, 44 Human Society, 13 Climate Action
Journal Title
npj Climate Action
Conference Name
Journal ISSN
2731-9814
2731-9814
Volume Title
3
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC