Repository logo
 

Escape Distance in Ground-Nesting Birds Differs with Individual Level of Camouflage.

Published version
Peer-reviewed

Repository DOI


Change log

Abstract

Camouflage is one of the most widespread antipredator strategies in the animal kingdom, yet no animal can match its background perfectly in a complex environment. Therefore, selection should favor individuals that use information on how effective their camouflage is in their immediate habitat when responding to an approaching threat. In a field study of African ground-nesting birds (plovers, coursers, and nightjars), we tested the hypothesis that individuals adaptively modulate their escape behavior in relation to their degree of background matching. We used digital imaging and models of predator vision to quantify differences in color, luminance, and pattern between eggs and their background, as well as the plumage of incubating adult nightjars. We found that plovers and coursers showed greater escape distances when their eggs were a poorer pattern match to the background. Nightjars sit on their eggs until a potential threat is nearby, and, correspondingly, they showed greater escape distances when the pattern and color match of the incubating adult's plumage-rather than its eggs-was a poorer match to the background. Finally, escape distances were shorter in the middle of the day, suggesting that escape behavior is mediated by both camouflage and thermoregulation.

Description

Journal Title

Am Nat

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

0003-0147
1537-5323

Volume Title

Publisher

University of Chicago Press

Rights and licensing

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as All rights reserved
Sponsorship
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/J014109/1)
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/G022887/1)
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/J018309/1)
In Zambia we thank the Bruce-Miller, Duckett and Nicolle families, Collins Moya and numerous other nest-finding assistants and land-owners, Lackson Chama, and the Zambia Wildlife Authority. We also thank Tony Fulford and are grateful for the helpful comments provided by Tim Caro, Innes Cuthill, Daniel Osorio, and two anonymous referees. J.T., J.W-A. and M.S. were funded by a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) grant BB/J018309/1 to M.S., and a BBSRC David Phillips Research Fellowship (BB/G022887/1) to M.S., and C.N.S was funded by a Royal Society Dorothy Hodgkin Fellowship, a BBSRC David Phillips Fellowship (BB/J014109/1) and the DST-NRF Centre of Excellence at the Percy FitzPatrick Institute.