Repository logo
 

Undetected perovskite phase interference with zirconolite dissolution measurements

Published version
Peer-reviewed

Repository DOI


Change log

Abstract

AbstractZirconolite ceramics present a chemically durable host matrix for waste actinides, but zirconolite dissolution rates reported in the literature often vary significantly. Here, the release of Ca and Al from a hot isostatically pressed zirconolite (Ca0.8Zr0.9Ce0.3Ti1.6Al0.4O7.0) was shown to be predominantly driven by preferential dissolution of minor perovskite and alumina phases. Both phases were undetectable by XRD, and the perovskite was difficult to detect by SEM-EDS. Whilst the zirconolite phase exhibited no signs of alteration, dissolution of the perovskite proceeded congruently without forming a hydrated altered layer or diffusion of protons into the solid that would be indicative of an ion-exchange mechanism. The weak temperature dependence of dissolution (40, 90 and 150 °C) showed that kinetics were limited by transport and a mixed transport-surface controlled reaction for Ca and Al, respectively. A significant H2O-D2O isotope effect on dissolution was observed for Ca but not for Al at all temperatures. The former was consistent with an abated rate of hydrolysis in the absence of a contribution from diffusion, whilst the latter could be attributed to differences in the activated complex for Ca and Al release through hydrolysis. These results demonstrate the role of a secondary phase perovskite in the dissolution kinetics of zirconolite even when perovskite occurs at low concentration and evades detection by bulk techniques such as XRD. This study provides a potential explanation of variations in zirconolite ceramic dissolution rates present in the literature and provides a null result to tests of an incongruent Ca release mechanism from zirconolite.

Description

Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank Iris Buisman (Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge) for training and assistance throughout the EPMA analysis, Jason Day (Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge) for training and assistance throughout the ICP-MS analysis, Carmen M. Fernandez-Posada (Maxwell Centre, University of Cambridge) for training and assistance throughout the XPS analysis and for providing training in XPS data analysis, and Mark Isaacs (HarwellXPS, EPSRC National Facility for XPS) for running further analysis by XPS. The authors would also like to thank Colleen Mann (Jacobs) for discussing and proofreading the manuscript, and Paul Cook (Nuclear Decommissioning Authority) for proofreading the manuscript. T.L.G. and I.F. were funded by Nuclear Decommissioning Authority under NDA0122POH000326. A.H.M. was supported by EPSRC (grant EP/T012811/1). The funder played no role in study design, data collection, data analysis or data interpretation, or the writing of this manuscript’s technical content. The authors acknowledge use of the Cambridge XPS System (Cambridge Equipment, EPSRC grant EP/P024947/1), part of Sir Henry Royce Institute (EPSRC recurrent grant EP/R00661X/1). Further X-ray photoelectron (XPS) data collection was performed at the EPSRC National Facility for XPS (“HarwellXPS”), operated by Cardiff University and UCL, under Contract No. PR16195.

Keywords

Journal Title

npj Materials Degradation

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

2397-2106

Volume Title

8

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Rights and licensing

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International
Sponsorship
Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) (NDA0122POH000326, NDA0122POH000326)
RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) (EP/T012811/1)