Repository logo
 

Is the ‘Living Instrument’ Approach of the European Court of Human Rights Compatible with the ECHR and International Law?

Accepted version
Peer-reviewed

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Type

Article

Change log

Authors

Abstract

The article offers a rebuttal of prominent criticisms directed against the ‘living instrument’ interpretative approach of the European Court of Human Rights. The paper initially introduces the basic application of the interpretative approach as adopted by the Court and then considers whether it is compatible with the Convention and broader international law. The paper argues that the Preamble, subsequent State practice and preparatory work offer inconclusive evidence to both critics and supporters of the ‘living instrument’. However, the interpretative approach can claim democratic endorsement through States, while arguments based on the necessity to consider domestic interpretation of the ECHR cannot support a restrictive interpretation as a matter of international law. The ‘living instrument’ further appears compatible in the context of state sovereignty in international law, and the broader institutional concerns with the role of judges in the adjudication of rights. Ultimately, the ‘living instrument’ interpretative approach therefore appears legal under the Convention and relevant International Law.

Description

Keywords

ECHR, Living Instrument, Human Rights, International Law, VCLT, Legal Interpretation, Travaux Préparatoire, Original Intent, State Sovereignty

Journal Title

European Public Law

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

1354-3725
1875-8207

Volume Title

23

Publisher

Kluwer Law International

Publisher DOI

Publisher URL