FGFR1 amplification or overexpression and hormonal resistance in luminal breast cancer: rationale for a triple blockade of ER, CDK4/6, and FGFR1.


Type
Article
Change log
Authors
Mouron, Silvana 
Manso, Luis 
Caleiras, Eduardo 
Rodriguez-Peralto, Jose L 
Rueda, Oscar M 
Abstract

BACKGROUND: FGFR1 amplification, but not overexpression, has been related to adverse prognosis in hormone-positive breast cancer (HRPBC). Whether FGFR1 overexpression and amplification are correlated, what is their distribution among luminal A or B HRPBC, and if there is a potential different prognostic role for amplification and overexpression are currently unknown features. The role of FGFR1 inhibitors in HRPBC is also unclear. METHODS: FGFR1 amplification (FISH) and overexpression (RNAscope) were investigated in a N = 251 HRPBC patients cohort and the METABRIC cohort; effects on survival and FISH-RNAscope concordance were determined. We generated hormonal deprivation resistant (LTED-R) and FGFR1-overexpressing cell line variants of the ER+ MCF7 and T47-D and the ER+, FGFR1-amplified HCC1428 cell lines. The role of ER, CDK4/6, and/or FGFR1 blockade alone or in combinations in Rb phosphorylation, cell cycle, and survival were studied. RESULTS: FGFR1 overexpression and amplification was non-concordant in > 20% of the patients, but both were associated to a similar relapse risk (~ 2.5-fold; P < 0.05). FGFR1 amplification or overexpression occurred regardless of the luminal subtype, but the incidence was higher in luminal B (16.3%) than A (6.6%) tumors; P < 0.05. The Kappa index for overexpression and amplification was 0.69 (P < 0.001). Twenty-four per cent of the patients showed either amplification and/or overexpression of FGFR1, what was associated to a hazard ratio for relapse of 2.6 (95% CI 1.44-4.62, P < 0.001). In vitro, hormonal deprivation led to FGFR1 overexpression. Primary FGFR1 amplification, engineered mRNA overexpression, or LTED-R-acquired FGFR1 overexpression led to resistance against hormonotherapy alone or in combination with the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib. Blocking FGFR1 with the kinase-inhibitor rogaratinib led to suppression of Rb phosphorylation, abrogation of the cell cycle, and resistance-reversion in all FGFR1 models. CONCLUSIONS: FGFR1 amplification and overexpression are associated to similar adverse prognosis in hormone-positive breast cancer. Capturing all the patients with adverse prognosis-linked FGFR1 aberrations requires assessing both features. Hormonal deprivation leads to FGFR1 overexpression, and FGFR1 overexpression and/or amplification are associated with resistance to hormonal monotherapy or in combination with palbociclib. Both resistances are reverted with triple ER, CDK4/6, and FGFR1 blockade.

Description
Keywords
FGFR1 amplification, FGFR1 overexpression, Luminal breast cancer, Palbociclib, Rogaratinib, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents, Biomarkers, Tumor, Breast Neoplasms, Cell Line, Tumor, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6, Disease Management, Disease Susceptibility, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Female, Gene Amplification, Gene Expression, Humans, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Middle Aged, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Neoplasm Staging, Prognosis, RNA, Messenger, Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1, Receptors, Estrogen, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult
Journal Title
Breast Cancer Res
Conference Name
Journal ISSN
1465-5411
1465-542X
Volume Title
23
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Sponsorship
Cancer Research UK (unknown)
Cancer Research UK (unknown)
Cancer Research UK (unknown)
Cancer Research UK (60098573)
Cancer Research UK (unknown)
Cancer Research UK (A9401)
Cancer Research UK (A16942)
Cancer Research UK (A7325)