Reply to "Comment on 'Natural Bond Orbitals and the Nature of the Hydrogen Bond'".
Accepted version
Peer-reviewed
Repository URI
Repository DOI
Change log
Authors
Abstract
Most of the Comment by Weinhold and Glendening (WG) (1) does not address the criticism of the natural bond orbital (NBO) approach to charge transfer set out in Stone’s paper (2) but seeks to find fault with symmetry-adapted perturbation theory (SAPT), although Stone’s criticism does not depend on comparisons with SAPT. The only part of their Comment that does address the issue is the discussion of their Figure 6, and that misses the point entirely, as we shall explain.
Description
Journal Title
J Phys Chem A
Conference Name
Journal ISSN
1089-5639
1520-5215
1520-5215
Volume Title
122
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Publisher DOI
Rights and licensing
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as All Rights Reserved
