Repository logo

Accuracy of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Measurements in Pocket-Sized Ultrasound Devices in a Simulation Model

Published version

Change log


Johnson, Garrett GRJ 
Jelic, Tomislav 
Derksen, Angela 
Unger, Bertram 
Zeiler, Frederick A 


jats:secjats:titleIntroduction</jats:title>jats:pTransorbital sonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) is an emerging non-invasive technique for the identification and monitoring of intracranial hypertension. In recent years, new pocket ultrasound devices have become available, and it is uncertain if they have the resolution to measure such small structures appropriately as compared to their predecessors. In this study, we measure the performance of three ultrasound units on a simulation model to establish their precision and accuracy.</jats:p></jats:sec>jats:secjats:titleMethods</jats:title>jats:pONSD was measured by three expert point-of-care sonographers using ultrasound machines three times on each of seven discrete ONS model sizes ranging from 3.5 to 7.9 mm. Two pocket ultrasounds (IVIZ, Sonosite, and Lumify, Philips) and one standard-sized portable ultrasound (M-Turbo, Sonosite) were used. Measurements were analyzed for mean error and variance and tested for significance using blocked covariance matrix regression analyses.</jats:p></jats:sec>jats:secjats:titleResults</jats:title>jats:pThe devices differed in their variances (Lumify: 0.19 mmjats:sup2</jats:sup>, M-Turbo: 0.26 mmjats:sup2</jats:sup>, IVIZ: 0.34 mmjats:sup2</jats:sup>) and their mean error (Lumify: −0.05 mm, M-Turbo: 0.10 mm, IVIZ: −0.10 mm). The difference in mean error between users is not significant (jats:italicp</jats:italic> = 0.45), but there is a significant difference in mean error between devices (jats:italicp</jats:italic> = 0.02).</jats:p></jats:sec>jats:secjats:titleConclusions</jats:title>jats:pAccurate ONSD measurement is possible utilizing pocket-sized ultrasound, and in some cases, may be more accurate than larger portable ultrasound units. While the differences in these devices were statistically significant, all three were highly accurate, with one pocket device (Lumify) outperforming the rest. Further study in human subjects should be conducted prior to using pocket ultrasound devices for jats:italicin vivo</jats:italic> diagnosis of intracranial hypertension.</jats:p></jats:sec>



Medicine, ultrasound, intracranial pressure, point-of-care, simulation, intracranial hypertension, optic nerve

Journal Title

Frontiers in Medicine

Conference Name

Journal ISSN


Volume Title



Frontiers Media SA