Repository logo
 

A systematic review comparing surveillance recommendations for the detection of recurrence following surgery across 16 common cancer types

Accepted version
Peer-reviewed

Change log

Abstract

ObjectivesIdentify and compare guidelines making recommendations for surveillance to detect recurrence in 16 common solid cancers after initial curative treatment in asymptomatic patients.Methods and analysisWe conducted a systematic review, combining search results from two electronic databases, one guideline organisation website (NICE), expert consultation and manual searching. Screening and data extraction were carried out by multiple reviewers. We collected data from each guideline on recommendations for surveillance and the use of risk stratification. Findings were compared between cancer types and regions. Text mining was used to extract statements on the evidence for surveillance. A protocol was published on PROSPERO in 2021 (CRD42021289625).ResultsWe identified 123 guidelines across 16 cancer types. Almost all guidelines (n=115, 93.5%) recommend routine surveillance for recurrent disease in asymptomatic patients after initial treatment. Around half (n=59, 51.3%) recommend indefinite or lifelong surveillance. The most common modality of surveillance was cross-sectional imaging. Risk stratification of frequency, length and mode of surveillance was widespread, with most guidelines (n=92, 74.8%) recommending that surveillance be adapted based on patient risk. More than a third (n=50, 39.0%) gave incomplete or vague recommendations. For 14 cancers, we found statements indicating there is no evidence that surveillance improves survival.ConclusionAlthough specific details of follow-up schedules vary, common challenges were identified across cancer types. These include heterogenous recommendations, vague or non-specific guidance and a lack of cited evidence supporting the use of surveillance to improve outcomes. Evidence generation in this area is challenging; however, increased availability to linked health records may provide a way forward.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021289625.

Description

Journal Title

BMJ Oncology

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

2752-7948
2752-7948

Volume Title

Publisher

BMJ

Rights and licensing

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International
Sponsorship
Cancer Research UK (EDDAPA-2022/100001)
Cancer Research UK (C96/A25177)
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (via NHS Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Integrated Care Board (ICB)) (NIHR205404)
The work was supported by the International Alliance for Cancer Early Detection, a partnership between Cancer Research UK, Canary Center at Stanford University, the University of Cambridge, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, University College London, and the University of Manchester. HH is funded by a CRUK International Alliance for Cancer Early Detection (ACED) Pathway Award (EDDAPA-2022/100001). GS is funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) under its Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Programme (Grant Reference Number NIHR205404). JAUS is funded by an NIHR Advanced Fellowship (NIHR300861). GDS is supported by The Mark Foundation for Cancer Research, the Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre (C9685/A25177 and CTRQQR-2021\100012), and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203312). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.