A product of independent beta probabilities dose escalation design for dual-agent phase I trials.
View / Open Files
Publication Date
2015-04-15Journal Title
Stat Med
ISSN
0277-6715
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons Ltd
Volume
34
Pages
1261-1276
Language
English
Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Mander, A., & Sweeting, M. (2015). A product of independent beta probabilities dose escalation design for dual-agent phase I trials.. Stat Med, 34 1261-1276. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6434
Abstract
Dual-agent trials are now increasingly common in oncology research, and many proposed dose-escalation designs are available in the statistical literature. Despite this, the translation from statistical design to practical application is slow, as has been highlighted in single-agent phase I trials, where a 3 + 3 rule-based design is often still used. To expedite this process, new dose-escalation designs need to be not only scientifically beneficial but also easy to understand and implement by clinicians. In this paper, we propose a curve-free (nonparametric) design for a dual-agent trial in which the model parameters are the probabilities of toxicity at each of the dose combinations. We show that it is relatively trivial for a clinician's prior beliefs or historical information to be incorporated in the model and updating is fast and computationally simple through the use of conjugate Bayesian inference. Monotonicity is ensured by considering only a set of monotonic contours for the distribution of the maximum tolerated contour, which defines the dose-escalation decision process. Varied experimentation around the contour is achievable, and multiple dose combinations can be recommended to take forward to phase II. Code for R, Stata and Excel are available for implementation.
Keywords
Adaptive design, Dual-agent trial, Non-parametric, Phase I clinical trial, Dose-escalation
Sponsorship
We would like to acknowledge funding from the UK Medical Research Council (grant code U1052.00.014) for this work.
We would also like to thank the reviewers for providing some excellent suggestions to help improve the manuscript.
Funder references
Medical Research Council (MR/L003120/1)
British Heart Foundation (None)
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6434
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/247197
Rights
Attribution 2.0 UK: England & Wales, Creative Commons Attribution License 2.0 UK
Licence URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/
Statistics