Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFowler, Patrick Wen
dc.contributor.authorGuest, Simonen
dc.contributor.authorSchulze, Bernden
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-17T12:53:05Z
dc.date.available2016-02-17T12:53:05Z
dc.date.issued2016-02-15en
dc.identifier.citationFowler et al. International Journal of Solids and Structures (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.02.006en
dc.identifier.issn0020-7683
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/253815
dc.description.abstractA class of over-braced but typically flexible body-hinge frameworks is described. They are based on polyhedra with rigid faces where an independent subset of faces has been replaced by a set of holes. The contact polyhedron C describing the bodies (vertices of C) and their connecting joints (edges of C) is derived by subdivision of the edges of an underlying cubic polyhedron. Symmetry calculations detect flexibility not revealed by counting alone. A generic symmetry-extended version of the Grübler-Kutzbach mobility counting rule accounts for the net mobilities of infinite families of this type (based on subdivisions of prisms, wedges, barrels, and some general inflations of a parent polyhedron). The prisms with all faces even and all barrels are found to generate flexible perforated polyhedra under the subdivision construction. The investigation was inspired by a question raised by Walter Whiteley about a perforated polyhedron with a unique mechanism reducing octahedral to tetrahedral symmetry. It turns out that the perforated polyhedron with highest (OhOh) point-group symmetry based on subdivision of the cube is mechanically equivalent to the Hoberman Switch-Pitch toy. Both objects exhibit an exactly similar mechanism that preserves TdTd subgroup symmetry over a finite range; this mechanism survives in two variants suggested by Bob Connelly and Barbara Heys that have the same contact graph, but lower initial maximum symmetry.
dc.description.sponsorshipSupported by EPSRC First Grant EP/M013642/1.
dc.languageEnglishen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 UK: England & Wales*
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/uk/*
dc.source.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectrigidityen
dc.subjectmobilityen
dc.subjectcubic polyhedronen
dc.subjectsymmetryen
dc.titleMobility of a class of perforated polyhedraen
dc.typeArticle
dc.description.versionThis is the final version of the article. It first appeared from Elsevier via https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.02.006en
prism.endingPage113
prism.publicationDate2016en
prism.startingPage105
prism.volume85-86en
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-02-03en
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.02.006en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2016-02-15en
dc.contributor.orcidGuest, Simon [0000-0002-0152-6579]
dc.identifier.eissn1879-2146
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 UK: England & Wales
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 UK: England & Wales