Repository logo
 

Cerebral haemodynamics during experimental intracranial hypertension.

Accepted version
Peer-reviewed

Repository DOI


Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Change log

Abstract

Intracranial hypertension is a common final pathway in many acute neurological conditions. However, the cerebral haemodynamic response to acute intracranial hypertension is poorly understood. We assessed cerebral haemodynamics (arterial blood pressure, intracranial pressure, laser Doppler flowmetry, basilar artery Doppler flow velocity, and vascular wall tension) in 27 basilar artery-dependent rabbits during experimental (artificial CSF infusion) intracranial hypertension. From baseline (∼9 mmHg; SE 1.5) to moderate intracranial pressure (∼41 mmHg; SE 2.2), mean flow velocity remained unchanged (47 to 45 cm/s; p = 0.38), arterial blood pressure increased (88.8 to 94.2 mmHg; p < 0.01), whereas laser Doppler flowmetry and wall tension decreased (laser Doppler flowmetry 100 to 39.1% p < 0.001; wall tension 19.3 to 9.8 mmHg, p < 0.001). From moderate to high intracranial pressure (∼75 mmHg; SE 3.7), both mean flow velocity and laser Doppler flowmetry decreased (45 to 31.3 cm/s p < 0.001, laser Doppler flowmetry 39.1 to 13.3%, p < 0.001), arterial blood pressure increased still further (94.2 to 114.5 mmHg; p < 0.001), while wall tension was unchanged (9.7 to 9.6 mmHg; p = 0.35).This animal model of acute intracranial hypertension demonstrated two intracranial pressure-dependent cerebroprotective mechanisms: with moderate increases in intracranial pressure, wall tension decreased, and arterial blood pressure increased, while with severe increases in intracranial pressure, an arterial blood pressure increase predominated. Clinical monitoring of such phenomena could help individualise the management of neurocritical patients.

Description

Journal Title

J Cereb Blood Flow Metab

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

1040-8827
1559-7016

Volume Title

37

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Rights and licensing

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Sponsorship
Medical Research Council (G0600986)
Medical Research Council (G0600986/1)
The authors would acknowledge Dr Hugh Richards and Dr Stefan Piechnik who contributed to data collection. JD is supported by a Woolf Fisher scholarship. GVV is supported by an A.G. Leventis Foundation Scholarship, and a Charter Studentship from St Edmund’s College, Cambridge. XYL is supported by Bill Gates Scholarship, and DC is supported by a Cambridge Commonwealth, European & International Trust Scholarship (University of Cambridge).