The Cambridge Crime Harm Index: Measuring Total Harm from Crime Based on Sentencing Guidelines
View / Open Files
Authors
Sherman, Lawrence
Neyroud, Peter
Neyroud, Eleanor
Publication Date
2016-09-01Journal Title
Policing (Oxford): a journal of policy and practice
ISSN
1752-4512
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
171-183
Language
English
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Sherman, L., Neyroud, P., & Neyroud, E. (2016). The Cambridge Crime Harm Index: Measuring Total Harm from Crime Based on Sentencing Guidelines. Policing (Oxford): a journal of policy and practice, 10 (3), 171-183. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paw003
Abstract
The logic of simply summing crimes of all kind into a single total has long been challenged as misleading. All crimes are not created equal. Counting them as if they are fosters distortion of risk assessments, resource allocation, and accountability. To solve this problem, Sherman (2007, 2010, 2011 and 2013) has offered a general proposal to create a weighted 'Crime Harm Index (CHI).' This article provides and explicates a detailed procedure for operationalizing this idea in UK: what we call the 'Cambridge CHI.' The new elements of the Cambridge CHI presented here are (1) the use of the 'starting point' in the national Sentencing Guidelines to define the number of days in prison for each offence type; (2) the exclusion of proactively detected, previously unreported offences, and (3) a comparative analysis of the Cambridge and other approaches to weighting crime harm, judged by a three-pronged test of democracy, reliability, and cost.
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paw003
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/254901
Recommended or similar items
The following licence files are associated with this item: