Repository logo
 

Modelling of Brain Deformation After Decompressive Craniectomy.

Published version
Peer-reviewed

Change log

Authors

Fletcher, Tim L 
Wirthl, Barbara 
Kolias, Angelos G 
Adams, Hadie 
Hutchinson, Peter JA 

Abstract

Hyperelastic finite element models, with either an idealized cylindrical geometry or with realistic craniectomy geometries, were used to explore clinical issues relating to decompressive craniectomy. The potential damage in the brain tissue was estimated by calculating the volume of material exceeding a critical shear strain. Results from the idealized model showed how the potentially damaged volume of brain tissue increased with an increasing volume of brain tissue herniating from the skull cavity and with a reduction in craniectomy area. For a given herniated volume, there was a critical craniectomy diameter where the volume exceeding a critical shear strain fell to zero. The effects of details at the craniectomy edge, specifically a fillet radius and a chamfer on the bone margin, were found to be relatively slight, assuming that the dura is retained to provide effective protection. The location in the brain associated with volume expansion and details of the material modeling were found to have a relatively modest effect on the predicted damage volume. The volume of highly sheared material in the realistic models of the craniectomy varied roughly in line with differences in the craniectomy area.

Description

Keywords

Brain injury, FE analysis, Neurosurgery, Brain, Decompressive Craniectomy, Humans, Models, Neurological, Shear Strength, Skull

Journal Title

Ann Biomed Eng

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

0090-6964
1573-9686

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Sponsorship
Medical Research Council (G0601025)
NETSCC (None)
TCC (None)
TLF acknowledges funding from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). BW is supported by the Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes, the Max Weber-Programm and the Stiftung Maximilianeum. AGK is supported by a Royal College of Surgeons of England Research Fellowship (funded by the Freemasons and the Rosetrees Trust), a National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Academic Clinical Fellowship and a Raymond and Beverly Sackler Studentship. PJH is supported by a NIHR Research Professorship and the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre.
Relationships
Is supplemented by: