Detection of Rare Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles by Active and Passive Surveillance Approaches.
Authors
Mather, Alison E
Reeve, Richard
Mellor, Dominic J
Matthews, Louise
Reid-Smith, Richard J
Dutil, Lucie
Haydon, Daniel T
Reid, Stuart WJ
Publication Date
2016Journal Title
PLoS One
ISSN
1932-6203
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Volume
11
Number
e0158515
Language
English
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Mather, A. E., Reeve, R., Mellor, D. J., Matthews, L., Reid-Smith, R. J., Dutil, L., Haydon, D. T., & et al. (2016). Detection of Rare Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles by Active and Passive Surveillance Approaches.. PLoS One, 11 (e0158515) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158515
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance systems are generally not specifically designed to detect emerging resistances and usually focus primarily on resistance to individual drugs. Evaluating the diversity of resistance, using ecological metrics, allows the assessment of sampling protocols with regard to the detection of rare phenotypes, comprising combinations of resistances. Surveillance data of phenotypic AMR of Canadian poultry Salmonella Heidelberg and swine Salmonella Typhimurium var. 5- were used to contrast active (representative isolates derived from healthy animals) and passive (diagnostic isolates) surveillance and assess their suitability for detecting emerging resistance patterns. Although in both datasets the prevalences of resistance to individual antimicrobials were not significantly different between the two surveillance systems, analysis of the diversity of entire resistance phenotypes demonstrated that passive surveillance of diagnostic isolates detected more unique phenotypes. Whilst the most appropriate surveillance method will depend on the relevant objectives, under the conditions of this study, passive surveillance of diagnostic isolates was more effective for the detection of rare and therefore potentially emerging resistance phenotypes.
Keywords
Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Drug Resistance, Bacterial, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Models, Theoretical, Population Surveillance, Salmonella, Salmonella Infections, Animal, Salmonella enterica, Swine
Sponsorship
AEM was supported by the William Stewart Fellowship whilst at the University of Glasgow, and is currently supported by Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) grant BB/ M014088/1; RR is supported by BBSRC grant BB/ E010326/1 and BB/L004070/1; LM is supported by BB/K01126X/1, BB/L004070/1, BB/F015313/1, National Science Foundation DEB1216040 and an EU-funded Marie Curie Initial Training Network (MCITN) program (NEMATODE SYSTEM HEALTH project (FP7-PEOPLE-2010-ITN- ID:264639)).
Funder references
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/M014088/1)
Embargo Lift Date
2100-01-01
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158515
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/257030
Rights
Attribution 4.0 International, Attribution 4.0 International, Attribution 4.0 International
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk
The following licence files are associated with this item: