jats:titleAbstract</jats:title>jats:pIn jats:italicLaws</jats:italic> 3.680b–c the Athenian Stranger's positive evaluation of the Cyclopean ‘way of life’ (jats:italicOd</jats:italic>. 9.112–15) is deeply indebted to Antisthenes’ jats:italicinterpretatio Homerica</jats:italic> of the Cyclopes as ‘just’ insofar they do not have the jats:italicneed</jats:italic> of jats:italicwritten</jats:italic> law. Antisthenes’ equation of ‘need of law’ with ‘need of written law’ is then contextualized within the unresolved tension, in the legislative project of the jats:italicLaws</jats:italic>, between oral dissemination (‘proems’ to the laws) and the potentially coercive power of the written text. Finally, Megillus’ inept reply to the Homeric quotation by the Athenian Stranger allows us to gain a more nuanced view of the ‘readerly’ dynamics enacted by the internal audience of the jats:italicLaws</jats:italic>.</jats:p>